Open Access
Review
Table 1
PROMIS and upper extremity injuries.
| Author | Year | Study type and level of evidence | # of patients | PROMIS domain | Study injury | Other PROMs | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayakumar et al. [32] | 2020 | Prospective cohort study, II | 364 | Upper extremity (CAT) | Distal radial fracture | PCS, PSEQ-2, TSK-11, QuickDASH, PRWE, and EQ-5D-3L | Being retired, using antidepressants, having greater pain interference, and greater pain catastrophizing accounted for the majority of variation of PROMIS Upper Extremity at 6–9 months. |
| Bhashyam et al. [33] | 2020 | Retrospective cohort study, III | 53 | Physical function (SF), upper extremity (SF), global mental, global physical | Distal humerus fracture | QuickDASH | PROMIS Psychological scores were independently associated with PROMIS Physical Function scores and correlated with both PROMIS Physical Function and Upper Extremity scores. |
| Bernstein et al. [34] | 2019 | Retrospective cohort study, IV | 823 | Pain interference (CAT), physical function (CAT), depression (CAT) | Distal radius fracture, wrist or hand sprain, tendon rupture, traumatic finger amputation, or scaphoid fracture | Worse pain coping strategies and lower levels of physical functioning were independently associated with more frequent orthopaedic office visits after traumatic wrist or hand injuries. | |
| Jayakumar et al. [24] | 2019 | Prospective cohort study, II | 734 | Physical function (CAT), upper extremity (CAT) | Shoulder, elbow or wrist fracture | QuickDASH, OES, OSS, PRWE, EQ-5D-3L | For patients with proximal humerus and distal radius fractures, PROMIS measured quality of life instead of its intended construct, patient perception of physical capability. |
| Gausden et al. [23] | 2018 | Prospective cohort study, II | 174 | Physical function (CAT), upper extremity (CAT), pain interference (CAT) | Distal radius, elbow, humeral shaft, proximal humeral, or clavicular fracture | VAS, DASH, SF-36, UCLA shoulder rating scale, Constant Shoulder score, Mayo Elbow Performance score | PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity and Pain Interference have less absolute floor and ceiling effects when compared to legacy PROMs. |
| Kaat et al. [22] | 2017 | Prospective cohort study, II | 132 | Physical function (SF), upper extremity (CAT) | Upper extremity fracture | QuickDash, PF-10, SMFA | PROMIS Upper Extremity may be superior to full body PROMs because of its excellent reliability, correlation with legacy PROMs, sensitivity to physical improvements over time, and decreased patient burden. |
| Morgan et al. [20] | 2015 | Prospective cohort study, II | 47 | Physical function (CAT) | Proximal humerus fracture | Constant Shoulder score, DASH, SMFA | PROMIS PF CAT correlates well with legacy PROMS with significantly shorter time to complete. |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.