Open Access

Table 2

Published outcomes following revision TKA with the use of offset stems on the femoral and tibial sides.

Author Years rTKA Mean age Etiology Straight/offset stems Follow-up Outcomes/Conclusion
Present study 2010–2022 789 72.7 years Infection (31.8%) 609/88 59.3 months Offset stems are occasionally (11%) in rTKA and probably overestimate regarding post-operative radiographic evaluation
Aseptic loosening (28.6%)
Malposition (13.2%)
Rosso et al. [13] 2008–2016 53 71.5 years Aseptic loosening (41.5%) 37/16 56.6 months A stepwise approach may achieve good clinical and radiological outcomes
Infection (30.2%)
Instability (9.4%)
Crawford et al. [14] 2005–2013 278 67 years Aseptic loosening (47%) 241/37 (tibial) 6 years Modular revision systems improve clinical outcomes and provide good survivorship
Instability (13.2%)
Polyethylene wear (22%)
Brilhault and Ries [3] 1998–2005 126 57.9 years n/a 91/35 (femoral) 4.5 years Offset femoral stem increases the resulting PCO and improves alignment
Sah et al. [15] 1998–2003 88 68.8 years Aseptic loosening (52%) 62/26 (femoral) 65 months Hybrid stem fixation contributes to a durable fixation and reduces stem tip pain
Infection (17%) 24/64 (tibial)
Instability (9%)
Nakasone et al. [16] 2001–2003 52 64.7 years Infection (31%) 0/52 n/a Diaphyseal uncemented offset stems facilitate accurate alignment for both femoral and tibial components
Stiffness (23%)
Aseptic loosening (17%)

rTKA: revision total knee arthroplasty; PCO: posterior condylar offset; n/a: not applicable.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.