Open Access
Review
Table 3
Comparison of results with different techniques.
| Author | Treatment | Type of study | N | Success rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ogon et al. [20] | Conservative | Prospective cohort study | 420 | 73% |
| Moya et al. [23] | ESWT | Retrospective series | 23 | 82.6% |
| Werry et al. [30] | Barbotage | Retrospective chart review | 179 | Not statistically significant at 1 year |
| Vassalou et al. [36] | Barbotage | Prospective series | 79 | Results influenced by deposit size and initial pain level at 1 year |
| Cho et al. [41] | Artrhoscopy | Retrospective series | 35 | Clinical scores improved slowly, recovery of shoulder function and pain relief required up to 6 months |
| Balke et al. [47] | Artrhoscopy | Case series | 70 | Operated shoulders have significantly lower clinical scores than healthy shoulders. |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.