Open Access
Editorial

Table 3

Summary of the most important published related studies on magnesium sulfate intravenous infusions in orthopaedic surgery. (IT: intrathecal; IV: intravenous).

Study Studies/patients (n) Surgical focus Key findings Conclusions/notes
Gormley et al. [53] 141 studies/20,963 patients (113 RCTs) Orthopaedic surgery Only 4 studies (2.8%) involved magnesium sulfate; overall review on opioid-sparing strategies Highlighted need for better RCT methodology and more evidence on magnesium use
Peng et al. [9] 11 RCTs/535 patients Perioperative IV Magnesium in Orthopaedic Surgery Six studies showed pain reduction; 5 did not. Reduced nausea, vomiting, and shivering Mixed analgesic results; beneficial for perioperative symptom reduction
Sbitan et al. [6] 9 RCTs IT vs. IV Magnesium in Orthopaedic Surgery Only 3 trials directly compared IT vs. IV; both routes showed efficacy Mode of administration (IT vs. IV) remains an unsolved issue
Campos et al. [30] 8 RCTs/541 patients Spinal surgery ↓ Pain, ↓ opioid and muscle relaxant use; ↓ MAP vs. steroids; enhanced vecuronium effect Magnesium is safe, effective, with synergistic benefits; dosing protocols vary
Yue et al. [54] 14 trials/781 patients Spinal surgery ↓ Morphine use at 24 h IV magnesium is effective in reducing postoperative opioid needs
Azimi et al. [5] 8 RCTs/536 patients Total knee arthroplasty ↓ Opioid use in first 24 h; low-moderate evidence for analgesic efficacy Heterogeneity in dosing/methods; more research needed

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.