Table 3
The boundaries for tibia and femoral implant during total knee arthroplasty among included studies.
| Study | Tibia varus | ref-TR | Tibia slope | Femoral valgus | Femoral flexion | Femoral int/rot | ref-FR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0° to LDFA° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA | |
| Andriollo et al. [12]* | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0° to LDFA° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Andriollo et al. [13]* | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0° to LDFA° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Andriollo et al. [14]* | 0 to 6° | MA: s/t balancing | 0 to 7° | ±3° | NR | NR | MA: s/t balancing |
| FA: NR | FA: TEA | ||||||
| Choi et al. [15]* | 3° varus to 3° valgus | Akagi line | 0 to 7° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 7° | −6° to 6° | TEA |
| Clark et al. [7]* | 0 to 6° | NR | 0 to 3° | 0 to 6° | 0 to 5° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Daffara et al. [16] | 4° varus to 2° valgus | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0 to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Diquattro et al. [17] | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0 to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Diquattro et al. [18] | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | 0° to LDFA° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [19]* | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [20]# | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [21]# | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [22]# | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [23]# | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [24]# | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al. [25]# | 0 to 6° | NR | 0 to 3° | NR | NR | NR | TEA |
| Koutserimpas et al.[26]# | Groupe A: 0 to 3° | NR | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | NR |
| Groupe B: 0 to 6° | |||||||
| Manara et al. [27] | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | ±6° | PCA |
| Nixon et al. [8]* | 0 to 6° | s/t balancing | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
| Yang et al. [28]* | 5° varus to 5° valgus | Akagi’s line | 0 to 7° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | −6° to 3° | TEA |
| Young et al. [29]* | 0 to 6° | s/t balancing | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | ±3° | TEA |
| Yu et al. [30]* | 0 to 6° | Akagi’s line | 0 to 3° | −3° to 6° | 0 to 10° | 3° to 6° | TEA |
Data are expressed as mean* or median# (degrees of angle) ± SD.
Abbreviations: ref-TR, reference for tibial rotation; int/rot, internal rotation; ref-FR, reference for femoral rotation; NR, not reported; s/t balancing, soft-tissue balancing; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MA, mechanical alignment; FA functional alignment; TEA, surgical trans-epicondylar axis; PCA, posterior condylar axis.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.