Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 1, 2015
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 25 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Wrist & Hand | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015026 | |
Published online | 22 September 2015 |
Original Article
Does dorsal capsule interposition improve the results of proximal row carpectomy in Kienböck’s disease? One year randomized trial
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, SP, Brazil
* Corresponding author: vymoraes@gmail.com
Received:
26
March
2015
Accepted:
31
July
2015
Introduction: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is an option as a salvage procedure in late stage Kienböck’s disease. In this study, we hypothesize that interposition of a dorsal capsular flap following PRC improves functional outcomes. No comparative study is available to assess whether interposition is effective from the functional perspective. This study aims to determine whether the addition of this procedure may improve functional outcomes at a one year assessment.
Methods: Thirty adult patients with IIIA and IIIB Lichtman stages, aged 18–54 years, were randomized into two study groups. Fourteen patients were allocated to the “no interposition group” and 16 to the “interposition” group. DASH questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. Cooney’s system was used to assess pain, functional state, range of motion, and grip strength. Complications were also assessed. Final followup and clinical assessment occurred after 12 months.
Results: After 12 months and no patient losses, outcomes were similar in both groups. DASH scores (41.9 (7.5) vs. 42.9 (12.8), p = 0.79)), Cooney’s system (poor results, 0.6 vs. 0.14, p = 0.54), and complications were similar between groups. In conclusion, the inclusion of a dorsal capsular flap does not improve functional outcomes in PRC. Low rates of complications were found in both groups.
Key words: Kienböck’s disease / Carpectomy / Randomized trial / Lunate osteonecrosis
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.