Review Article

Outcomes of double level osteotomy for osteoarthritic knees with severe varus deformity. A systematic review

¹ Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, East Kent University Hospital, Kent TN240LY, UK
² Orthopaedic Senior House Officer, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork T12DC4A, Ireland
³ Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
⁴ Orthopaedic Registrar, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic, Galway University Hospital, Galway H91 YR71, Ireland

^* Corresponding author: elbardecy@hotmail.com

Received: 16 December 2021
Accepted: 19 February 2022

Abstract

Background: When correcting severe genu varus deformity, knee surgeons must choose between performing a single or double-level osteotomy. This systematic review aims to provide this equipoise with some clarity. Patients and methods: We conducted this study following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Studies evaluating the effect of the double level osteotomy (DLO) or those comparing it to high tibial osteotomy (HTO) from all regions and written in any language were included. Results: Six studies were included in this systematic review. They were prepared and analysed using Review Manager V5.0 [Computer Program] (RevMan5). Performing DLO resulted in restoring patellar height, joint-line convergence angle (JLCA), and mMPTA to normal values. DLO was also more successful at avoiding joint line obliquity (JLO) in severe varus deformity when compared to HTO (P < 0.001). No significant difference was reported between the two cohorts regarding the mLPTA. DLO resulted in satisfactory short term KOOS and IKDC scores. The complication rate after DLO was 2.28%. Conclusions: DLO showed a low complication rate and satisfactory short term KOOS and IKDAC scores. Randomised control trials with long term follow-up comparing the DLO and HTO are recommended.