Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 58 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Knee | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024056 | |
Published online | 23 December 2024 |
Original Article
Blood loss in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining vs. posterior stabilized. A propensity score-matched analysis
1
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, 99 Moo 9, Phitsanulok-Nakohn Sawan Road, Mueang District, Phitsanulok, Thailand
2
Department of Orthopedics, Kamphaeng Phet Hospital, 428 Ratcha Damnoen 1 Road, Mueang District, Kamphaeng Province 62000, Thailand
3
Center of Excellence in Preventive & Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathum Wan District, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
4
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathum Wan District, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
5
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 621 N. Washington Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
* Corresponding author: pt-rp@hotmail.com
Received:
20
August
2024
Accepted:
24
November
2024
Introduction: Although single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) presents several advantages, higher perioperative blood loss is a potentiate drawback that is still inevitable. Cruciate retaining (CR) TKA may theoretically result in less blood loss, offer better proprioception, and more physiologic kinematics compared to posterior stabilized (PS) TKA. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative blood loss and recovery among patients who underwent CR and PS BTKA. Methods: A cohort of 46 CR BTKA and 80 PS BTKA performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively evaluated. Identical surgical techniques and perioperative care were provided to all patients. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare blood loss, a visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain level, morphine consumption, knee flexion arc, and length of stay (LOS). Results: Comparing CR BTKA and PS BTKA, drain output was 206.44 mL vs. 194.89 mL (p = 0.47), calculated blood loss was 886.23 mL vs. 724.89 mL (p = 0.05), and blood transfusion rate was 18% vs. 17% (p = 1.00). Additionally, CR BTKA had higher VAS than PS BTKA, at 6 h: 5.74 vs. 3.78 (p < 0.001), and at 12 h: 5.80 vs. 4.74 (p = 0.02). CR BTKA group had higher morphine consumption (26.87 mg vs. 19.74 mg; p = 0.01) in the first 48 h. CR BTKA showed significantly less knee flexion angle during 48–72 h postoperative. Conclusions: The use of the CR prosthesis in BTKA could not demonstrate a superiority over the PS design in terms of blood loss, and recovery of knee function during the acute postoperative period.
Key words: Knee arthroplasty / Blood loss / Blood transfusion / Pain / Prostheses
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.