Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 59 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Hip | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024055 | |
Published online | 23 December 2024 |
Original Article
Robotic-assisted versus conventional hip arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of perioperative blood management and early outcomes
Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
* Corresponding author: tarunjaykumar@gmail.com
Received:
5
September
2024
Accepted:
24
November
2024
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty (RATHA) versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA) on perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, and early clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center from January 2021 to January 2023. A total of 200 patients undergoing primary THA were equally divided into RATHA (using the MAKO SmartRobotics system) and CTHA cohorts. Propensity score matching adjusted for demographics and baseline characteristics, resulting in 172 matched patients. Primary outcomes included changes in perioperative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion rates. Secondary outcomes assessed were operative time, length of stay, and transfusion-related adverse events. Results: The RATHA group demonstrated significantly lower post-operative hemoglobin drops (2.49 ± 0.6 g/dL vs. 3.38 ± 1.0 g/dL; p < 0.001), reduced EBL on post-operative day 3 (1125.52 ± 361.2 mL vs. 1611.12 ± 501.4 mL; p < 0.0001), and lower transfusion rates (7.96% vs. 20.4%; p = 0.0175) compared to the CTHA group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the RATHA group (68.01 ± 8.7 minutes vs. 77.1 ± 10.5 minutes; p < 0.0001). All robotic cohort patients were discharged within 3 days, whereas 14% of CTHA patients required extended hospitalization. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) significantly reduces perioperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion rates compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty (CTHA). The observed decrease in operative time and hospital stay in the RATHA group further suggests that robotic assistance may enhance procedural efficiency and support faster patient recovery.
Key words: Total hip arthroplasty / Robotic-assisted surgery / Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty / Blood loss / Blood transfusion / MAKO SmartRobotics
Publisher note: The abstract of this article has been revised by the authors and corrected on 7 January 2025.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.