Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 8 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Knee | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025002 | |
Published online | 10 February 2025 |
Original Article
Limited accuracy of transtibial aiming for anatomical femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction
1
ATOS Klinik Heidelberg, Internationales Zentrum für Orthopädie, Bismarckstraße 9-15, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
2
General University Hospital ATTIKO, 1st Surgical Orthopaedic Department of N.K.U.A., Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12462, Greece
* Corresponding author: dsmastrokalos@gmx.net
Received:
11
December
2024
Accepted:
8
January
2025
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common knee injury, and with advancements in knee arthroscopy, ACL reconstruction has become common. Techniques like single-double bundle and femoral tunnel drilling via transtibial or anteromedial portal approaches are available. This study evaluates the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement via these approaches in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Materials and methods: Forty-three ACL reconstructions using hamstring grafts were analyzed. Initially, femoral tunnels were drilled via the anteromedial portal from 09:30 to 10:00 (14:00 to 14:30 for left knees). Tibial tunnels (mean anteroposterior angle: 63.5°, sagittal: 64.2°) were then created with the same diameter, accompanied by radiological documentation. A femoral aiming device was used to place a K-wire at the center of the femoral tunnel, recorded photographically. Tunnel diameters included 7 mm (20 cases), 7.5 mm (11 cases), 8 mm (7 cases), 8.5 mm (3 cases), and 9 mm (1 case). Two observers evaluated all radiological and photographic data, focusing on the deviation of the transtibial K-wire from the femoral tunnel center. Results: Of 38 evaluated cases, the transtibial K-wire was within the femoral tunnel in 11 cases (28.9%) – 7 cases with 7 mm, 2 cases each with 7.5 mm and 8 mm diameters. In 23 cases (60.5%), the K-wire was at the perimeter or outside the femoral tunnel – 11 cases with 7 mm, 8 with 7.5 mm, 4 with 8 mm, 3 with 8.5 mm, and 1 with 9 mm diameters. Conclusion: Transtibial aiming for anatomical femoral tunnel positioning is challenging. No significant correlation was found between the transtibial deviation and the tibial tunnel diameter.
Key words: Knee arthroscopy / Anterior cruciate ligament / Single-bundle ACL technique / ACL femoral tunnel positioning / Transtibial femoral tunnel
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.