Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis

Open Access

Review

Table 1

MINORS evaluation for selected studies.

	Clearly stated aim	Inclusion of consecutive patients	Endpoint appropriate to study aim	Unbiased assessment of study endpoint	Follow-up period appropriate to study aim	<5% lost to follow-up	Prospective calculation of study size	Adequate control group	Contemporary groups	Baseline equivalence of groups	Adequate statistical analyses	Total	Adequate number of patients	Risk of bias
Harwin et al. [20]	2	1	2	NA	1	0	0	2	1	1	2	11\24	Yes	High
Jauregui et al. [23]	2	2	2	NA	2	2	0	2	0	1	2	16\24	Yes	High
Stucinskas et al. [24]	2	2	1	NA	2	0	0	1	2	0	2	12\24	Yes	High
Schmidt et al. [19]	2	2	0	NA	1	2	0	1	2	1	2	13\24	Yes	High
Abdel et al. [21]	2	2	2	NA	1	0	1	2	2	1	1	14\24	Yes	High
Gonzalez et al. [22]	2	2	0	NA	2	0	2	2	2	2	2	16\24	Yes	High
Hernigou et al. [25]	2	0	2	NA	2	1	0	2	1	2	2	13\24	No	High
Assi et al. [26]	2	2	2	NA	1	2	0	2	2	1	2	16\24	No	High

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.