Open Access
Table 5
Comparison table of results found by large-scale studies.
| Number of patients | Main findings | |
|---|---|---|
| MOON Cohort Study | 263 | Revision was required in 0 of 61 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8mm in diameter and 14 of 202 patients (6.5%) with 8 mm or smaller grafts (p=0.037) |
| Snaebjörnsson et al. [15] | Cases: 560 | The likelihood of revision surgery for every 0.5-mm increase in the HT autograft diameter between 7.0 and 10.0mm was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75–0.99;p=0.03) |
| Controls: 1680 | ||
| Alkhalaf et al. (this study) | 711 | Patients with a 4-strand autograft size that was less than 8mm were 7.2 times more at risk for ACLR failure (RR 7.2, 95% CI: 6.02; 8.35, p=0.007) |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.