Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 59
Number of page(s) 4
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021059
Published online 24 November 2021

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Lipomas are the most common benign mesenchymal neoplasm in humans. They usually present as painless, slow-growing masses. History is mostly long but sometimes only recently noticed. Their peak incidence occurs in the 5th to 7th decades of life. Lipomas are found almost anywhere in the body. One can distinguish superficial (subcutaneous) and deep lipomas (muscular tissue) depending on their localization. The latter are further divided into intermuscular, intramuscular, parosteal, or intraosseous. Treatment of choice is a marginal excision, and local recurrence is almost nihil.

Conventionally lipomas are composed of mature adipose tissue, but sometimes they can contain other mesenchymal elements such as fibrous tissue, blood vessels, and, less frequently, cartilage or bone. These variations in composition do not affect treatment nor prognosis [1].

The present paper reports an unusual example of an osteochondrolipoma, which is a mixture of distinct osseous and cartilaginous areas within a bigger adipocytic differentiated mass. Besides this rare combination, its location in the thigh makes it a very uncommon finding. Features and differential diagnosis of osteochondrolipoma are discussed.

Case report

A 54-year-old woman was referred to the University Hospitals Leuven with the preliminary diagnosis of a soft tissue tumor in the right upper leg identified as a mass of 43 mm × 62 mm on plain radiograph and echography. She had been complaining of irradiating pain on the lateral aspect of the right leg for 4 months and a one-week history of a palpable mass in the right thigh. There was no remarkable medical history and no recent significant trauma to the affected region.

Clinical evaluation revealed a well-defined nodular mass in the deeper aspect of the right tight, measuring about 5 cm. No concomitant tenderness, swelling, erythema, or other superficial skin lesions were found. The range of motion of the right hip and knee were unaffected and palpation for aberrant inguinal lymph nodes was negative.

At the time of referral, plain radiographs of the hip and pelvis showed crumbly calcification within a soft tissue mass posterior to the trochanteric region without a sign of bone erosion.

Echography concluded on a non-growing, well-demarcated inhomogeneous muscular tumor without an argument for myositis (Figure 1). Based on the clinic and first radiological characteristics, one decided for further investigation by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a diagnostic ultrasound-guided needle biopsy. T1 sequences showed a high-intensity signal equal to that of the subcutaneous fat, mainly present in the periphery, confirming the fatty characteristic of this lesion. T2 sequences revealed diffuse dystrophic calcification deep in the mass (Figure 2). Despite the proximity of the mass to the femur, no clear continuity with the adjacent femoral cortex or bone marrow was shown. Oedema and adenopathy were absent. Compared to a 2-years old computed tomography (CT) where the mass was overlooked, a minimal volume increase was noted with a current size of 94 mm × 53 mm × 66 mm. The retrospective protocol describes a lesion fully encapsulated by the right musculus quadratus femoris. Biopsy of the lesion demonstrated fibromyxoid to chondroid mesenchymal cells of unknown origin with no evidence of malign morphologic signs.

thumbnail Figure 1

From left to right; plain radiographs and ecchography of the right hip revealing a soft tissue mass with scattered calcifications.

thumbnail Figure 2

From left to right; front t1 and t2-weighted MRI sequences and axial t1 MRI sequence of the right hip.

Based on this information, a tentative diagnosis of pleomorphic/round cell lipoma was made, and marginal resection was performed. We used the Kocher Langenbeck-type approach with an incision placed slightly more posterior to facilitate exposure and dissection of the sciatic nerve. After muscle splitting of the gluteus maximus fibers with the division of the proximal half of the tendon at 1 cm of its insertions, the sciatic nerve was carefully dissected out and protected. The mass was fully encapsulated by a thin transparent membrane and strongly attached to the underlying femur. The surface of the specimen was stone-hard but smooth, with a yellow shine covering a homogeneous pattern of white and gray dots. The resected tumor was sent for histopathological analysis. Postoperatively, the patient showed no vascular or neurological complications. A mild limp was noted due to dissection of the abductors, which quickly resolved with physiotherapy. At the latest consultation (12 months post-operative), the patient reported manifest improvement of the original discomfort. Clinical examination and ultrasound scans did not show any signs of local recurrence. Plain radiographs did not show any calcified density to suggest local recurrence.

Microscopic examination revealed a well-circumscribed mesenchymal tumor consisting of mature hyaline cartilage islands contiguous with bony trabeculae embedded in mature adipose tissue (Figure 3). No mitotic figure or cytological atypia was observed. Based on these results, we conclude on an osteochondrolipoma, completely excised with clear margins.

thumbnail Figure 3

The tumor consists of fat (f), bone (b), and cartilage (c).

Discussion

Generally, when equally divided, a tumor consisting of more than one type of mesenchymal tissue is called a mesenchymoma. The term “osteochondrolipoma” refers to the different amounts of cartilage and bone present in the specimen. This combination of those two rare subtypes has been documented only a few times, and among them, mostly in the head and neck region. Presence in the lower half of the body is uncommon, as previously alighted by Kitazawa and Shiba (Table 1) [2]. To the best of our knowledge, only one other case was reported to occur in the region of the thigh.

Table 1

Previously reported cases of osteochondrolipomas*.

Until now, no clear consensus exists about the pathogenesis of osteochondrolipomas. Two main theories have been proposed to explain cartilaginous and osseous differentiation in lipomas. The first one suggests that fatty, osseous, and cartilaginous tissue may arise from multipotent undifferentiated mesenchymal cells). This hypothesis has been reinforced over the last years by several studies showing at the first place the presence of different differentiation lines of multipotent stem cells in mature human fatty tissue, and at the second place the in vitro multidirectional differentiation potency of adipose-derived stem cells obtained from liposuction) [3]. The second theory advocates for a metaplastic process in pre-existing lipomas or tumor stroma creating osseous and cartilaginous components).

Both CT and MRI are useful in the diagnosis of osteochondrolipomas. CT is the procedure of choice to demonstrate the presence of osseous elements and evaluate the relation of the mass to the surrounding bony structures (erosions and/or continuity). 3D reconstruction does not add indispensable information but can help localize the tumor and show the anatomical orientation of the mass, parameters that facilitates excision. In addition, it gives a good overview of the scattered calcifications. On the other hand, MRI has widely considered the best imaging technique for evaluation fatty processes. Lipomas typically appear as a signal identical to subcutaneous fat with a perfect homogenous configuration. The intensity of the signal is stable over all the pulse sequences and will only disappear on the fat suppression sequence. On MRI, calcification and connective tissues will appear as areas with low density.

Although the concomitant presence of osseous, cartilaginous, and adipocytic areas in one specimen is typical for osteochondromalipoma, one should not overlook other pathologies. Cartilage differentiation can be found in soft tissue chondroma (extraskeletal chondroma), chondroid lipoma, and as part of post-traumatic chondrification. Differential diagnosis of a calcified mass should include myositis ossificans, ossifying (fibromyxoid tumor), osteoma, and secondary hyperostosis. Further on, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and teratoma should also be taken into consideration. The final diagnosis will mainly depend on the pleomorphism and atypia of the tumor and the relation of the encountered components to each other (proportion, encapsulated, or superficial). In the same way, needle biopsy only samples an infinite part of the tumor and evaluates tissue architecture or assessment of local invasion impossible. For this reason, incisional biopsy should be favored for comprehensive pathological examination. We also strongly recommend sending the whole mass for further investigation after resection.

In conclusion, we exposed the clinical, radiological, and histological findings of an osteochondrolipoma located in the thigh of a middle-aged female. Microscopic examination confirmed the presence of cartilage, bone, and fat components within the tumor. After marginal excision, no recurrence occurred at 12 months. Pathogenesis of osteochondrolipoma remains speculative. We reported the case due to its exceptional rarity as being the second described in this region.

Conflict of interest

RD, RS, FS, DH, and HW certify that they do not have a financial conflict of interest (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) in connection with this article.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required.

Informed consent

Written informed consent of the patient was obtained for this publication.

Authors contributions

RD wrote the manuscript with support from HW and FS. The operation was carried out by HW and RD. The mass was characterized by RS, DH, SF and HW. HW supervised the project.

References

  1. Tasic D, Pavlovic M, Stankovic D, Dimov I, Stanojevic G, Dimov D (2013) Ossifying chondrolipoma of the tongue. Vojnosanit Pregl 69, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kitazawa T, Shiba M (2017) Osteochondrolipoma of the mandible. Eplasty 17, e35. eCollection 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gimble JM, Guilak F (2003) Adipose-derived adult stem cells: Isolation, characterization, and differentiation potential. Cytotherapy 5, 362–369. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gru AA, Santa Cruz DJ (2012) Osteochondrolipoma: A subcutaneous lipoma with chondroid and bone differentiation of the chest wall. J Cutan Pathol 39, 461–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu J, Li Y, Fan M, He X, Wang L (2018) Osteochondrolipoma: A lipoma with cartilaginous and osseous differentiation of the ischium. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 11, 4724–4730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Debras R, Sciot R, Hompes D, Sinnaeve F & Wafa H (2021) (2021) An egg in the leg: Case report of an osteochondrolipoma. SICOT-J 7, 59

All Tables

Table 1

Previously reported cases of osteochondrolipomas*.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

From left to right; plain radiographs and ecchography of the right hip revealing a soft tissue mass with scattered calcifications.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

From left to right; front t1 and t2-weighted MRI sequences and axial t1 MRI sequence of the right hip.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

The tumor consists of fat (f), bone (b), and cartilage (c).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.