Table 1
LAP-VEGaS Video Assessment Tool (original in bold)/LAP-VEGaS-FAI (modified in italics).
| Item description | Step presented (0) | Presented partly (+1) | Presented completely (+2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Information on authors and institutions. Video title, including name of the procedure and pathology treated | □ | □ | □ |
| – Authors + conflict of interest + title = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 2. Formal presentation of the case, including clinical details and imaging of the patient, the indication for surgery. The anonymity of the patient is preserved | □ | □ | □ |
| – Presentation case = clinical + imaging + anonymity = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If no presentation of the case = 0 | |||
| 3. Patient position, first and organization surgical team | □ | □ | □ |
| – Position + VA (capsulotomy) + organization = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 4. The surgical procedure is presented in a standardized way, step by step | □ | □ | □ |
| – Bone gesture + labral gesture/cartilaginous = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 5. Intraoperative results are clearly demonstrated, with a constant reference to anatomy | □ | □ | □ |
| – Central explo (clamp – labrum – cartilage; wave sign) + periph (cam) = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 6. Postoperative results of the procedure are presented | □ | □ | □ |
| – Postoperative Rx + labrum sucking effect | |||
| + dynamic testing = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 7. Additional graphic aids are included, such as diagrams, snapshots, and photos, to show anatomical landmarks, discoveries relevant or unexpected, or to present additional educational content (scopy re-e time) | □ | □ | □ |
| – Tips and tricks + scopy (milling acetabulum + femur) + educational content additional (plica/vx) = + 2 | |||
| – If missing 1 = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 8. An audio/written commentary in English is provided | □ | □ | □ |
| – Audio/written commentary = + 2 | |||
| – Incomplete/poor quality = + 1 | |||
| – If missing 2 = 0 | |||
| 9. Image quality is appropriate with a clear and constant view of the operating field. Video is smooth with proper speed (hand vision) | □ | □ | □ |
| – Excellent image quality + operative field vision = + 2 | |||
| – If quality is average or absence of operative field vision = + 1 | |||
| – If poor quality = 0 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.