Table 2
Five-point Likert scale on single-peer/trainer video recommendations and the acceptance of the video for publication or presentation on the podium.
| Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. I recommend this video to a peer/intern. | □ strongly disagree | □ disagree | □ neither agree nor disagree | □ agree | □ strongly agree |
| 2. The video is of satisfactory quality for a presentation/publication. | □ strongly disagree | □ disagree | □ neither agree nor disagree | □ agree | □ strongly agree |
| 3. Overall video quality | □ very poor | □ poor | □average | □ good | □ very good |
| 4. Overall educational content of the video. | □ very poor | □ poor | □ average | □ good | □ very good |
| 5. Time required to complete the correction note (only the time needed to complete the note, not the time of the video). | □ >4 min | □ 3–4 min | □ 2–3 min | □ 1–2 min | □ <1 min |
| 6. How satisfied are you with the use of the score? | □ very unsatisfied | □ unsatisfied | □ neither unsatisfied nor satisfied | □ satisfied | □ very satisfied |
| 7. I would like you to use the new scoring system of LAP-VEGaS? | □ strongly disagree | □ disagree | □ neither agree nor disagree | □ agree | □ strongly agree |
| 8. The elements of the LAP-VEGaS score help to differentiate educational/non-educational videos of good or poor quality. | □ strongly disagree | □ disagree | □ neither agree nor disagree | □ agree | □ strongly agree |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.