Open Access
Volume 2, 2016
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 7
Section Shoulder
Published online 15 February 2016
  1. Burkhart SS, Lo IK (2006) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14(6), 333–346. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Accousti KJ, Flatow EL (2007) Technical pearls on how to maximize healing of the rotator cuff. Instr Course Lect 56, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained? Am J Sports Med 39(10), 2108–2116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lafosse L, Brozska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2007) The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(7), 1533–1541. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE et al. (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34, 407–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, 403–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM et al. (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, 2425–2431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DeHaan A, Axelrad T, Kaye E, Silvestri L, Puskas B, Foster T (2012) Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 40, 1176–1185. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weiler A, Hoffmann RFG, Bail HJ, Rehm O, Sudkamp NP (2002) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy 18, 124–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22(12), 1360.e1–1360.e5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mallon WJ, Misamore G, Snead DS, Denton P (2004) The impact of preoperative smoking habits on the results of rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(2), 129–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olley LM, Carr AJ (2008) The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(4), 326–331. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K (2003) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19(10), 1109–1120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Conboy VB, Morris RW, Kiss J et al. (1996) An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B, 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  15. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1965) Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. Chicago, IL, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. [Google Scholar]
  16. The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3), 199–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2007) Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 35(8), 1254–1260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Habermeyer P, Magosch P (2006) Classifications of complete rotator cuff tears according to Bateman, in Classifications and Scores of the Shoulder. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 23. [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22, 1168–1173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15, 691–696. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oguma H, Murakami G, Takahashi-Iwanaga H et al. (2001) Early anchoring collagen fibers at the bone-tendon interface are conducted by woven bone formation: light microscope and scanning electron microscope observation using a canine model. J Orthop Res 19, 873–880. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dines JS, Bedi A, ElAttrache NS et al. (2010) Single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18, 83–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park MC, Idjadi JA, Elattrache NS et al. (2008) The effect of dynamic external rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 36, 893–900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE et al. (2007) Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16, 461–468. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS et al. (2007) Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16, 469–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mazzocca AD, Bollier MJ, Ciminiello AM et al. (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs over time. Arthroscopy 26, 592–599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Burkhart SS, Cole BJ (2010) Bridging self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair: we really are doing better. Arthroscopy 26(5), 677–680. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJP (2002) Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy 18, 519–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Toussaint B, Schnaser E, Bosley J, Lefebvre Y, Gobezie R (2011) Early structural and functional outcomes for arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 39(6), 1217–1225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Park JY, Lee SY, Chung SW, Zulkifli H, Cho JH, Oh KS (2013) Clinical comparison between double-row and transosseous-equivalent repairs for medium to large size rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(12), 1727–1734. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH et al. (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 36, 1310–1316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A, Ripalda J, Herrera A (2012) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study. Int Orthop 36(9), 1877–1883. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D (2007) Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med 35, 1247–1253. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Koh KH, Kang KC, Lim TK, Shon MS, Yoo JC (2011) Prospective randomized clinical trial of single- versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Arthroscopy 27(4), 453–462. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mihata T, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M, Tsujimura T, Fujiwara K, Kinoshita M (2011) Functional and structural outcomes of single-row versus double-row versus combined double-row and suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 39(10), 2091–2098. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nho SJ, Adler RS, Tomlinson DP, Allen AA, Cordasco FA, Warren RF, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD (2009) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 37(10), 1938–1945. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.