Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 2, 2016
Article Number 38
Number of page(s) 5
Section Ankle
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016029
Published online 18 November 2016
  1. Krause FG, Schmid T (2012) Ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement: how do I decide? Foot Ankle Clin 17(4), 529–543. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlberg A, Henricson AS (1981) Late results of ankle fusion. Acta Orthop Scand 52(1), 103–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24, 888–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Snedeker JG, Wirth SH, Espinosa N (2012) Biomechanics of the normal and arthritic ankle joint. Foot Ankle Clin 17(4), 517–528. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bleazey ST, Brigido SA, Protzman NM (2013) Perioperative complications of a modular stem fixed-bearing total ankle replacement with intramedullary guidance. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(1), 36–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Myerson MS, Mroczek K (2003) Perioperative complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 24(1), 17–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tan EW, Maccario C, Talusan PG, Schon LC (2016) Early complications and secondary procedures in transfibular total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 37(8), 835–841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Usuelli FG, Maccario C, Manzi L, Tan EW (2016) Posterior talar shifting in mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 37(3), 281–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16, 87–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7), 349–353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guyton GP (2001) Theoretical limitations of AOFAS scoring system: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int 22(10), 779–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J (1997) A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 19, 179–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Madeley NJ, Wing KJ, Topliss C, Penner MJ, Glazebrook MA, Younger AS (2012) Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, ankle osteoarthritis scale, AOFAS ankle hindfoot score and foot function index in end stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 33(1), 57–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hogg RV, Ledolter J (1987) Engineering Statistics. New York, MacMillan. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Broström L (1966) Sprained ankles VI: surgical treatment of “chronic” ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand 132, 551–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.