Open Access
Volume 4, 2018
Article Number 40
Number of page(s) 5
Section Knee
Published online 12 September 2018
  1. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein A (1982) The posterior stabilised condylar prosthesis: a modification of total condylar design. Two to four year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg 64(9), 1317. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Straw R, Kulkarni S, Attfield S, Wilton TJ (2003) Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance? J Bone Joint Surg 85(5), 671–674. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liabaud B, Patrick Jr DA, Geller JA (2013) Is the posterior cruciate ligament destabilized after the tibial cut in a cruciate retaining total knee replacement? Knee 20(6), 412–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matziolis G, Mehlhorn S, Schattat N, Diederichs G, Hube R, Perka C (2012) How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6), 1083–1086. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shannon FJ, Cronin JJ, Cleary MS, Eustace SJ, O'Byrne JM (2007) The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we preserve it? A radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(6), 766–771. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sessa P, Fioravanti G, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2015) The risk of sacrificing the PCL in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and the relationship to the sagittal inclination of the tibial plateau. Knee 22(1), 51–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinotti G, Sessa P, Amato M, Ripani FR, Giannicola G (2015) Preserving the PCL during the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(8), 2594–2601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feyen H, Van ON, Bellemans J (2013) Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(12), 2674–2679. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43, 752–757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Verra WC, van den BLG, Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AA, Schoones JW, Nelissen RG (2015) Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 86(2), 195–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bercik MJ, Joshi A, Parvizi J (2013) Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 28(3), 439–444. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L (2014) Posterior cruciateretaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(3), 556–564. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Misra AN, Hussain MRA, Fiddian NJ, Newton G (2003) The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(3), 389–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harwin SF, Kester M (2010) Single radius total knee arthroplasty: PCL sacrifice without substitution yields excellent outcomes minimum 8-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 19, 191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parsley BS, Conditt MA, Bertolusso R, Noble PC (2006) Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2), 127–131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Narvy SJ, Pearl M, Vrla M, Yi A, Hatch GF III (2015) Anatomy of the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(2), 345–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11), 1055–1059. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee YS, Ra HJ, Ahn JH, Ha JK, Kim JG (2011) Posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion anatomy and implications for tibial tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 27(2), 182–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moorman CT III, Murphy ZMS, Bansai S, Cina SJ, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Kaseta MK (2008) Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods. Arthroscopy 24(3), 269–275. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Totlis T, Iosifidis M, Melas I, Apostolidis K, Agapidis A, Eftychiakos N, Alvanos D, Kyriakidis A (2016) Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: how much of the PCL is really retained? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(11), 3556–3560. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Onishi Y, Hino K, Watanabe S, Watamori K, Kutsuna T, Miura H (2016) The influence of tibial resection on the PCL in PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and cadaveric study. J Orthop Sci 2658(16), 30103–30108. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hatsushika D, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, Yamaguchi K, Muneta T, Akita K (2013) Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5), 998–1004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RW (1991) Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (269), 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  24. Laskin RS, Rieger MA (1989) The surgical technique for performing a total knee replacement arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 20, 31–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chiu KY, Zhang SD, Zhang GH (2000) Posterior slope of tibial plateau in Chinese. J Arthroplasty 15, 224–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.