EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 5 (2019) SICOT-J, 5 (2019) 32 References
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 5, 2019
Special Issue: Rotator Cuff Tears – Is this a solved problem? Guest Editor: Jacinto Monteiro
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 6
Section Shoulder
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2019026
Published online 04 September 2019
  1. Mall NA, et al. (2014) Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(9), 778–788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamamoto A, et al. (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(1), 116–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lambers Heerspink FO, et al. (2014) Specific patient-related prognostic factors for rotator cuff repair: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7), 1073–1080. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tashjian RZ, et al. (2010) Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 38(12), 2435–2442. [Google Scholar]
  5. Biberthaler P, et al. (2003) Microcirculation associated with degenerative rotator cuff lesions. In vivo assessment with orthogonal polarization spectral imaging during arthroscopy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3), 475–480. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lohr JF, Uhthoff HK (1990) The microvascular pattern of the supraspinatus tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rathbun JB, Macnab I (1970) The microvascular pattern of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52(3), 540–553. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goutallier D, et al. (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fuchs B, et al. (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: Assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6), 599–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moher D, et al. (2001) The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 285(15), 1987–1991. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Aitken RC (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 62(10), 989–993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Syrotuik J (1999) Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients. Curr Med Res Opin 15(2), 113–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reips UD, Funke F (2008) Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS generator. Behav Res Methods 40(3), 699–704. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6), 602–608. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Constant CR (1986) Age related recovery of shoulder function after injury. Galway, Ireland. NUI. p. 124. [Google Scholar]
  16. Constant CR, et al. (2008) A review of the constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(2), 355–361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214, 160–164. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cofield RH (1982) Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154(5), 667–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sugaya H, et al. (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: Single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21(11), 1307–1316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Manning CN, et al. (2011) Sustained delivery of transforming growth factor beta three enhances tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model. J Orthop Res 29(7), 1099–1105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Adler RS, et al. (2008) Rotator cuff in asymptomatic volunteers: Contrast-enhanced US depiction of intratendinous and peritendinous vascularity. Radiology 248(3), 954–961. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Adler RS, et al. (2011) Contrast-enhanced sonographic characterization of the vascularity of the repaired rotator cuff: Utility of maximum intensity projection imaging. J Ultrasound Med 30(8), 1103–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rudzki JR, et al. (2008) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound characterization of the vascularity of the rotator cuff tendon: Age- and activity-related changes in the intact asymptomatic rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1 Suppl), 96S–100S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Uhthoff HK, Trudel G, Himori K (2003) Relevance of pathology and basic research to the surgeon treating rotator cuff disease. J Orthop Sci 8(3), 449–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kida Y, et al. (2013) Bone marrow-derived cells from the footprint infiltrate into the repaired rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(2), 197–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Caplan AI (2009) Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight J Pathol 217(2), 318–324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.