Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 5, 2019
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 7
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2019002
Published online 08 February 2019
  1. Song K-J, Taghavi CE, Hsu MS, Lee K-B, Kim G-H, Song J-H (2010) Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders. Eur Spine J 19, 1677. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Korinth M (2008) Treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease – Current status and trends. Zentralbl Neurochir – Cent Eur Neurosurg 69, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaiser MG, Haid RW, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE (2002) Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50, 229–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27, 2453–2458. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Riley LH, Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Heller JG (2005) Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: Prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30, 2564–2569. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 2310–2317. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A 87, 558–563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang JY, Song HS, Lee M, Bohlman HH, Riew KD (2009) Adjacent level ossification development after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 30–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AGU, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR (2009) A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 156–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou J, Li X, Dong J, Zhou X, Fang T, Lin H, Ma Y (2011) Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages. J Clin Neurosci 18, 1505–1509. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huskisson EC (1982) Measurement of pain. J Rheumatol 9, 768–769. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14, 409–415. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nurick S (1972) The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95, 87–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peolsson A, Peolsson M (2008) Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: A multivariate data analysis. Eur Spine J 17, 406–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, Song JH, Eun JP (2009) The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 2886–2892. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Štulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kučera R, Vyskočil T, Steudel WI (2009) Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: Two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 641–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 87, 558–563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang L, Gu Y, Liang L, Gao R, Shi S, Shi J, Yuan W (2012) Stand-alone anchored spacer versus anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Orthopedics, 35, e1503–e1510. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saphier PS, Arginteanu MS, Moore FM, Steinberger AA, Camins MB (2007) Stress-shielding compared with load-sharing anterior cervical plate fixation: a clinical and radiographic prospective analysis of 50 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 6, 391–397. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Majid K, Chinthakunta S, Muzumdar A, Khalil S (2012) A comparative biomechanical study of a novel integrated plate spacer for stabilization of cervical spine: An in vitro human cadaveric model. Clin Biomech 27, 532–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE (2014) Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Spine J 14, 128–136. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Scholz M, Schnake KJ, Pingel A, Hoffmann R, Kandziora F (2011) A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(3), 666–673. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA (2015) Zero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 28, E284–E290. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Barbagallo GMV, Romano D, Certo F, Milone P, Albanese V (2013) Zero-P: A new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single Institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices. Eur Spine J 22, S868–S878. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Scholz M, Schelfaut S, Pingel A, Schleicher P, Kandziora F (2014) A cervical “zero-profile” cage with integrated angle-stable fixation: 24-months results. Acta Orthop Belg 80, 558–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.