Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 5, 2019
Article Number 42
Number of page(s) 7
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2019039
Published online 29 November 2019
  1. Guo J-B, Zhu Y, Chen B-L, Xie B, Zhang W-Y, Yang Y-J, Yue Y-S, Wang X-Q (2015) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for vertebral compression fracture with osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10, e0127145. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Steffee AD, Biscup RS, Sitkowski DJ (1986) Segmental spine plates with pedicle screw fixation. A new internal fixation device for disorders of the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. El-Sharkawi M, Abdel Gawad M, El Sabrout AM, Hassan M (2017) Short versus long segment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt Spine J, 24, 6–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 19, 1741–1744. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai LY, Jin WJ (2005) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 354–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Avanzi O, Landim E, Meves R, Caffaro MF, de Albuquerque Araujo Luyten F, Faria AA (2010) Thoracolumbar burst fracture: load sharing classification and posterior instrumentation failure. Rev Bras Ortop, 45, 236–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laxer E (1994) A further development in spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J, 3, 347–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burns S, Biering-Sørensen F, Donovan W, Graves D, Jha A, Johansen M, Jones L, Krassioukov A, Kirshblum S, Mulcahey MJ, Read M, Waring W (2012) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 18, 85–99. [Google Scholar]
  9. Esses S (2006) Posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion provides better results than combined anterior plus posterior stabilization for mid-lumbar (L2 to L4) burst fractures: Commentary. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A, 88, 2311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahar A, Kim C, Wedemeyer M, Mitsunaga L, Odell T, Johnson B, Garfin S (2007) Short-segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 1503–1507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gelb D, Ludwig S, Karp JE, Chung EH, Werner C, Kim T, Poelstra K (2010) Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech, 23, 293–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: A consecutive 4 1/2-year series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 1157–1170 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2–L4) burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31, 859–868. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim GW, Jang JW, Hur H, Lee JK, Kim JH, Kim SH (2014) Predictive factors for a kyphosis recurrence following short-segment pedicle screw fixation including fractured vertebral body in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 56, 230–236. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yaman O, Dalbayrak S (2014) Kyphosis: diagnosis, classification and treatment methods. Turk Neurosurg, 24, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
  16. Briem D, Behechtnejad A, Ouchmaev A, Morfeld M, Schermelleh-Engel K, Amling M, Rueger JM (2007) Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine. Eur Spine J, 16, 1925–1933. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rometsch E, Spruit M, Härtl R, McGuire RA, Gallo-Kopf BS, Kalampoki V, Kandziora F (2017) Does operative or nonoperative treatment achieve better results in A3 and A4 spinal fractures without neurological deficit? Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Glob Spine J, 7, 350–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wahba GM, Bhatia N, Bui CNH, Lee KH, Lee TQ (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of short-segment posterior instrumentation with and without crosslinks in a human cadaveric unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, 278–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Court C, Vincent C (2012) Percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: current concepts. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 98, 900–909. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gasbarrini A, Cappuccio M, Colangeli S, Posadas MD, Ghermandi R, Amendola L (2013) Complications in minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures and tumors. Eur Spine J, 22 (Suppl. 6), 965–971. [Google Scholar]
  21. Giorgi H, Blondel B, Adetchessi T, Dufour H, Tropiano P, Fuentes S (2014) Early percutaneous fixation of spinal thoracolumbar fractures in polytrauma patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 100, 449–454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Elkhateeb T, Mahmoud A (2016) Posterior spinal fixation with fusion versus without fusion in treatment of dorsolumbar and lumbar fractures. Glob Spine J, 6 (1), DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582678. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang H, Zhao Y, Mo Z, Han J, Chen Y, Yu H, Wang Q, Liu J, Li C, Zhou Y, Xiang L (2017) Comparison of short-segment monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screw fixation combined with intermediate screws in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: A finite element study and clinical radiographic review. Clinics, 72, 609–617. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.