EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2021) SICOT-J, 7 (2021) 38 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 38
Number of page(s) 9
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021036
Published online 09 July 2021
  1. AOA (2020) Annual 2020. Aust Orthop Assoc Natl Jt Replace Regist 21, 219–289. [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, et al. (2019) How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet 393, 655–663 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang W, Sun M, Palmer J, et al. (2018) Patterns of compartment involvement in end-stage knee osteoarthritis in a Chinese Orthopedic Center: Implications for implant choice. Orthop Surg 10, 227–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heyse TJ, El-Zayat BF, De Corte R, et al. (2014) UKA closely preserves natural knee kinematics in vitro. Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 1902–1910. [Google Scholar]
  5. Heyse TJ, Slane J, Peersman G, et al. (2017) Kinematics of a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 1784–1791. [Google Scholar]
  6. Siman H, Kamath AF, Carrillo N, et al. (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 Years: Comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J Arthroplasty 32, 1792–1797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng M, Hu Y, Zhang Z, et al. (2021) Unicondylar knee replacement versus total knee replacement for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03790-7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kennedy JA, Mohammad HR, Mellon SJ, et al. (2020) Age stratified, matched comparison of unicompartmental and total knee replacement. Knee 27, 1332–1342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Welch VA, Page MJ (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch VLM The NewcastleeOttawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-randomized Studies in Meta-analysis. Ottawa Heal Res Inst 1, 1–12. (Accessed 10.01.2021) [Google Scholar]
  11. Morrison TA, Nyce JD, Macaulay WB, Geller JA (2011) Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26, 35–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yeo NEM, Chen JY, Yew A, et al. (2015) Prospective randomised trial comparing unlinked, modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: A five years follow-up. Knee 22, 321–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schrednitzki D, Beier A, Marx A, Halder AM (2020) No major functional benefit after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty at 5-Year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 35, 3587–3593. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Engh GA, Parks NL, Whitney CE (2014) A prospective randomized study of bicompartmental vs. total knee arthroplasty with functional testing and short term outcome. J Arthroplasty 29, 1790–1794. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goh JKM, Chen JY, Yeo NEM, et al. (2020) Ten year outcomes for the prospective randomised trial comparing unlinked, modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Knee 27, 1914–1922. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parratte S, Ollivier M, Opsomer G, et al. (2015) Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101, 547–552. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ko Y, Lo N-N, Yeo S-J, et al. (2013) Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement. Qual Life Res 22, 2455–2459. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, et al. (2015) WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30, 2154–2158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin Y, Yu Y, Zeng J, et al. (2020) Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18, 360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. CTNC, Collaboration (2014) RM (RevMan) [Computer P, Centre V 5. 3]. TC Review Manager vol 5.0. [Google Scholar]
  21. Siddharth S, Dutton A, Liang S, Dasde S (2013) Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medio-patellofemoral osteoarthritis: A comparison of early clinical and functional outcomes. J Knee Surg 26, 411–416. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tan SM, Dutton AQ, Bea KC, Kumar VP (2013) Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 21, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Biazzo A, Silvestrini F, Manzotti A, Confalonieri N (2019) Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study. Musculoskelet Surg 103, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma JX, He WW, Kuang MJ, et al. (2017) Efficacy of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for bicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A meta analysis. Int J Surg 46, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac J-M, Argenson J-NA (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1), 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  26. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Cartier P (2010) UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1227–1230. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chung JY, Min B-H (2013) Is bicompartmental knee arthroplasty more favourable to knee muscle strength and physical performance compared to total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2532–2541. [Google Scholar]
  28. Benazzo F, Rossi SMP, Ghiara M (2014) Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants – general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience. Knee 21, S43–S46. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brittain R, Dawson-bowling S, Goldberg A, et al. (2020) 17th Annual Report. Wales, North Irel Isle Man, Natl Jt Regist England, 120–193. [Google Scholar]
  30. Romagnoli S, Marullo M (2018) Mid-Term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of 105 gender-specific patellofemoral arthroplasties, with or without the association of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33, 688–695. [Google Scholar]
  31. Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, et al. (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 551–556. [Google Scholar]
  32. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E (2009) Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1157–1163. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Frisse D, et al. (2005) Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, et al. (2003) Proprioception with bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G, et al. (2007) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 30, 70–3. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sabatini L, Giachino M, Risitano S, Atzori F (2016) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.