EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2022) SICOT-J, 8 (2022) 13 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 5
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022013
Published online 06 April 2022
  1. Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, et al. (2003) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28, 1027–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hensinger RN (1989) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg 71, 1084–1107. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 2253–2257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kimura M (1968) My method of filling the lesion with spongy bone in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg 19, 285–295. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nicol RO, Scott JHS (1986) Lytic spondylolysis repair by wiring. Spine 11, 1027–1030. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J. Bone Jt Surg Br 52, 432–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J (1984) Surgical treatment of spondylolysis by bone grafting and direct stabilization by means of a hook and screw. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103, 175–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Songer MN, Rovin R (1998) Repair of the pars interarticularis defect with a cable-screw construct. A preliminary report. Spine 23, 263–269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod–screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine 24, 1252–1256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H (1996) Repair of the defects in spondylolysis by segmental pedicular screw hook fixation. Spine 21, 2041–2045. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of the lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26, 1873–1878. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet ii, 884–886. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, et al. (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8), 271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herkowitz HN, Dvorak J, Bell G, et al. (2004). The lumbar spine. In: Chapter 60: Nondegenerative spondylolisthesis: Epidemiology and natural history, classification, history and physical examination, and nonoperative treatment of adults. Rainville J, Editor. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 556–563. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sherman F, Rosenthal RK, Hall JE (1979) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children. Spine 4, 59–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elmekaty M, ElMehy E, Försth P, et al. (2018) Safety of a novel modular cage for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion – clinical cohort study in 20 patients with degenerative disc disease. SICOT-J 4, 24. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Virk SS, Niedermeier S, Yu E, et al. (2014) Adjacent segment disease. Orthopedics 37(8), 547–555. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Axelsson P, Johnson R, Strongrist B (1997) The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion. Spine 22, 414–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA (1999) Biomechanical comparison of spondylolysis fixation techniques. Spine 24, 328–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kakiuchi M (1997) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg 79, 818–825. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roca J, Iborra M, Albertí G, et al. (2005) Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical and CT-assessed study: an analysis of 19 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(suppl), S82–S89. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Debusscher F, Troussel S (2007) Direct repair of defects in lumbar spondylolysis with a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical, functional and CT-assessed study. Eur Spine J 16, 1650–1658. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shin MH, Ryu KS, Rathi NK, et al. (2012) Direct pars repair surgery using two different surgical methods: pedicle screw with universal hook system and direct pars screw fixation in symptomatic lumbar spondylosis patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 51(1), 14–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Raudenbush BL, Chambers RC, Silverstein MP, et al. (2017) Indirect pars repair for pediatric isthmic spondylolysis: a case series. J Spine Surg (Hong Kong). 3(3), 387–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ishida K, Aota Y, Mitsugi N, et al. (2018) Spondylolysis repair using a pedicle screw hook or claw-hook system – a comparison of bone fusion rates. Spine Surg Relat Res 2(2), 135–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Albassir A, Samson I, Hendrickx L (1990) Treatment of painful spondylolysis using Morscher’s hook. Acta Orthop Belg 56, 489–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ohmori K, Suzuki K, Ishida Y (1992) Translamino-pedicular screw fixation with bone grafting for symptomatic isthmic lumbar spondylolysis. Neurosurgery 30, 379–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Louis R (1988) Pars interarticularis reconstruction of spondylolysis using plates and screws with grafting without arthrodesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74(6), 549–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Biyani A (1997) Screw placement in the lumbar vertebral isthmus. Clin Orthop 338, 227–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.