Open Access
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
Published online 01 August 2023
  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89, 780–785. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Parvizi J, Jain N, Schmidt AH (2008) Periprosthetic knee fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22, 663–671. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meek RMD, Norwood T, Smith R (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93, 96–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Solarino G, Vicenti G, Moretti L (2014) Interprosthetic femoral fractures – A challenge of treatment. A systematic review of the literature. Injury 45, 362–368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoffmann MF, Lotzien S, Schildhauer TA (2016) Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates. Injury 47, 934–938. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ruchholtz S, El-Zayat B, Kreslo D (2013) Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur – a prospective study of 41 patients. Injury 44, 239–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebraheim NA, Kelley LH, Liu X (2015) Periprosthetic distal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 7, 297–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shin JH, Chang MJ, Kang S-B (2019) Management and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty with a stem extension. Medicine (Baltimore) 98, e16088. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Patsiogiannis N, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2021) Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 6, 75–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Unified Classification System for Periprosthetic Fractures (UCPF). (2018) J Orthop Trauma 32 Suppl 1:S141–S144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Gardner MJ (2016) Stress modulation of fracture fixation implants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24, 711–719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cunningham BP, Brazina S, Morshed S, Miclau T (2017) Fracture healing: A review of clinical, imaging and laboratory diagnostic options. Injury 48(Suppl 1), S69–S75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mortazavi SMJ, Kurd MF, Bender B (2010) Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25, 775–780. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wyles CC, Tibbo ME, Yuan BJ (2020) Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty with contemporary distal femoral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 102, 45–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Windhager R, Schreiner M, Staats K, Apprich S (2016) Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature. Inter Orthop (SICOT) 40, 935–943. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith WR, Stoneback JW, Morgan SJ, Stahel PF (2016) Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients Patient Saf Surg 10, 26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinberg EL, Elis J, Steinberg Y (2017) A double-plating approach to distal femur fracture: a clinical study. Injury 48, 2260–2265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Erhardt JB, Grob K, Roderer G (2008) Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate: a new angular stable implant. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 409–416. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peiró JVA, Ruiz MJ, Hernández JT (2021) The inverted Vancouver C fracture. Case series of unstable proximal femur fractures above a knee revision stem treated by short cephalomedullary nail and lateral submuscular overlapping plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 193–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perren SM, Fernandez Dell’Oca A, Lenz M, Windolf M (2011) Cerclage, evolution and potential of a Cinderella technology. An overview with reference to periprosthetic fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78, 190–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Apivatthakakul T, Phaliphot J, Leuvitoonvechkit S (2013) Percutaneous cerclage wiring, does it disrupt femoral blood supply? A cadaveric injection study Injury 44, 168–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJAM, Bulstra SK (2010) High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: An analysis of 71 cases. Injury 41, 629–633. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Platzer P, Schuster R, Luxl M (2011) Management and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 42, 1219–1225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Soenen M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F (2011) Interprosthetic femoral fractures: analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for an additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classifications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97, 693–698. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hou Z, Moore B, Bowen TR (2011) Treatment of interprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Trauma 71, 1715–1719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Michla Y, Spalding L, Holland JP, Deehan DJ (2010) The complex problem of the interprosthetic femoral fracture in the elderly patient. Acta Orthop Belg 76, 636–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Streubel PN (2013) Mortality after periprosthetic femur fractures. J Knee Surg 26, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mudiganty S, Hughes L, Choudry Q, Bokhari A (2022) Managing periprosthetic fractures – a review of the hub and spoke model. SICOT J 8, 2. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.