EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2024) SICOT-J, 10 (2024) 8 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 11
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024003
Published online 15 February 2024
  1. Kouyoumdjian P, Mansour J, Assi C, et al. (2020) Current concepts in robotic total hip arthroplasty. SICOT-J 6, 45. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Factor S, Rutenberg TF, Garceau S, et al. (2023) Long term results of total hip arthroplasty with cemented and cementless tapered femoral component. SICOT-J 9, 17. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Foissey C, Batailler C, Rajput V, et al. (2023) No dislocation and low complication rate for a modern dual mobility cup with pre-impacted femoral head in primary hip replacement: A consecutive series of 175 hips at minimum 5-year follow-up. SICOT-J 9, 1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sculco PK, Pagnano MW (2015) Perioperative solutions for rapid recovery joint arthroplasty: get ahead and stay ahead. J Arthroplasty 30, 518–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu X-W, Zi Y, Xiang L-B, Wang Y (2015) Total hip arthroplasty: a review of advances, advantages and limitations. Int J Clin Exp Med 8, 27–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vidalain J-P (2011) Twenty-year results of the cementless corail stem. Int Orthop 35, 189–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Selvaratnam V, Shetty V, Sahni V (2015) Subsidence in collarless Corail hip replacement. Open Orthop J 9, 194–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Melbye SM, Haug SCD, Fenstad AM, et al. (2021) How does implant survivorship vary with different Corail femoral stem variants? Results of 51,212 cases with up to 30 years of follow-up from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479, 2169–2180. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Demey G, Fary C, Lustig S, et al. (2011) Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. J Arthroplasty 26, 1549–1555. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ström H, Nilsson O, Milbrink J, et al. (2007) The effect of early weight bearing on migration pattern of the uncemented CLS stem in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22, 1122–1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Polus JS, Perelgut ME, Vasarhelyi EM, et al. (2022) Femoral stem migration after direct lateral and direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Can J Surg 65, E487–E495. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Perelgut ME, Polus JS, Lanting BA, Teeter MG (2020) The effect of femoral stem collar on implant migration and clinical outcomes following direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 102-B, 1654–1661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, et al. (2013) Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J 95-B, 747–757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 1006–1012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366, l4898. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis. Available at https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dammerer D, Blum P, Putzer D, et al. (2022) Migration characteristics of the Corail hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem-a retrospective clinical evaluation and migration measurement with EBRA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 517–524. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wirries N, Örgel M, Schwarze M, et al. (2022) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with anatomic-shaped implants. Does the minimal invasive anterolateral technique influence the stem position or subsidence in contrast to the standard lateral approach? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 2389–2395. [Google Scholar]
  19. Belgaïd V, Viste A, Fessy M-H (2022) Cementless hydroxyapatite-coated stem with dual mobility and posterior approach in over-80 year-old patients with osteoarthritis: Rates of dislocation and periprosthetic fracture at a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 108, 103196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Karayiannis PN, Cassidy RS, Isaac G, et al. (2021) Risk factors for significant radiolucent line development in a fully coated hydroxyapatite stem. J Arthroplasty 36, 3709–3715. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magill P, Hill J, O’Brien S, et al. (2020) Observed effect of femoral component undersizing and a collarless design in the development of radiolucent lines in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 6, 99–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoskins WT, Bingham RJ, Lorimer M, de Steiger RN (2020) The effect of size for a hydroxyapatite-coated cementless implant on component revision in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 41,265 stems. J Arthroplasty 35, 1074–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Louboutin L, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2017) Long-term survivorship of the CorailTM standard stem. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103, 987–992. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Magill P, Blaney J, Hill JC, et al. (2016) Impact of a learning curve on the survivorship of 4802 cementless total hip arthroplasties. Bone Joint J 98-B, 1589–15961. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J, Chambers I (2016) Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop 13, 322–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O, et al. (2007) Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89, 1574–1580. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Panichkul P, Bavonratanavech S, Arirachakaran A, Kongtharvonskul J (2019) Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 1693–1704. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Syed F, Hussein A, Katam K, et al. (2018) Risk of subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures using collared hydroxyapatite-coated stem for hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Hip Int 28, 663–667. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Streit MR, Innmann MM, Merle C, et al. (2013) Long-term (20- to 25-year) results of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and factors affecting survivorship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 3262–3269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McConnell JS, Syed FA, Saunders P, et al. (2022) Definition and validation of a system for classifying the undersized Corail femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 32, 737–746. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Boldt JG, Cartillier J-C, Machenaud A, Vidalain J-P (2015) Long-term bone remodeling in ha-coated stems: a radiographic review of 208 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with 15 to 20 years follow-up. Surg Technol Int 27, 279–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Søballe K, Hansen ES, B-Rasmussen H, et al. (1992) Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 10, 285–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malfroy Camine V, Rüdiger HA, Pioletti DP, Terrier A (2018) Effect of a collar on subsidence and local micromotion of cementless femoral stems: in vitro comparative study based on micro-computerised tomography. Int Orthop 42, 49–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Campbell D, Mercer G, Nilsson KG, et al. (2011) Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study. Int Orthop 35, 483–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ries C, Boese CK, Dietrich F, et al. (2019) Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study. Int Orthop 43, 307–314. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jeon I, Bae J-Y, Park J-H, et al. (2011) The biomechanical effect of the collar of a femoral stem on total hip arthroplasty. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 14, 103–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 231, 7–28. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mandell JA, Carter DR, Goodman SB, et al. (2004) A conical-collared intramedullary stem can improve stress transfer and limit micromotion. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 19, 695–703. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schaller G, Black J, Asaad A, et al. (2015) Primary collared uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: a safe and reliable treatment option. J Arthroplasty 30, 407–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kwong KS (1990) The biomechanical role of the collar of the femoral component of a hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72, 664–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-Dirini RMA, Huff D, Zhang J, et al. (2018) Influence of collars on the primary stability of cementless femoral stems: A finite element study using a diverse patient cohort. J Orthop Res 36, 1185–1195. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zimmerer A, Navas L, Kinkel S, et al. (2021) Midterm survivorship of an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral component and clinically meaningful outcomes in patients older than 75 years. J Clin Med 10, 1019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gascoyne T, Flynn B, Turgeon T, Burnell C (2019) Mid-term progressive loosening of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems paired with a metal-on-metal bearing. J Orthop Surg Res 14, 225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cantin O, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, et al. (2015) Compared fixation and survival of 280 lateralised vs. 527 standard cementless stems after two years (1–7). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101, 775–780. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Johnston MG, Eppich KE, Gray C, et al. (2022) Progressive proximal loosening of initially well-fixed bilateral Corail stems: a case report and review of the literature. Acta Orthop 93, 542–546. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lamb JN, Baetz J, Messer-Hannemann P, et al. (2019) A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation. Bone Joint J 101-B,779–786. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dale H, Børsheim S, Kristensen TB, et al. (2020) Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women – data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 91, 33–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, et al. (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96, e167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14, 231–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Meding JB, Galley MR, Ritter MA (2010) High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteoporotic bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 441–447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.