EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2024) SICOT-J, 10 (2024) 50 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 50
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024046
Published online 21 November 2024
  1. Erivan R, Tardieu A, Villatte G, et al. (2020) Évolution et projection de la chirurgie du genou en France de 2008 à 2070: étude épidémiologique avec analyse de tendance et projection. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 106, 508–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 57–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Canovas F, Dagneaux L (2018) Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104, S41–S46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Siqueira MBP, Haller K, Mulder A, et al. (2016) Outcomes of medial collateral ligament injuries during total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 29, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sikorski JM (2008) Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90, 1121–1127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Graichen H, et al. (2022) A safe transition to a more personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty: the importance of a “safe zone” concept. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 365–367. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Eid A, et al. (1997) Computer assisted spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337, 86–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22, 1097–1106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharma L, Song J, Dunlop D, et al. (2010) Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 69, 1940–1945. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, et al. (2019) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 32, 239–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A, et al. (2018) Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31, 2–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lei K, Liu L, Chen X, et al. (2022) Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 721–733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. (2017) Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103, 1047–1056. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, et al. (2015) Development of a modern knee society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30, 2311–2314. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bach CM, Mayr E, Liebensteiner M, et al. (2009) Correlation between radiographic assessment and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 16, 207–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McAuley JP, Engh GA (2003) Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: When and what? J Arthroplasty 18, 51–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morgan H, Battista V, Leopold SS (2005) Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13, 515–524. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ (2021) Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee Surg 34, 745–748. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. De Berardinis L, Senarighi M, Ciccullo C, et al. (2022) Fast-track surgery and telerehabilitation protocol in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to superior outcomes when compared with the standard protocol: a propensity-matched pilot study. Knee Surg Relat Res 34, 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Song E-K, Seon J-K, Yim J-H, et al. (2013) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 118–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, et al. (2017) Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg 9, 169–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, et al. (2019) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1132–1141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sequeira SB, Duvall GT, Boucher H (2023) A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens. J Exp Orthop 10, 34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, et al. (2022) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2677–2695. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Ruangsomboon P, Chareancholvanich K (2022) Alignment accuracy and functional outcomes between hand-held navigation and conventional instruments in TKA: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 1017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A, et al. (2017) Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 30, 849–853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Batailler C, Fernandez A, Swan J, et al. (2021) MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3585–3598. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh V, Fiedler B, Simcox T, et al. (2021) Does the use of intraoperative technology yield superior patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 36, S227–S232. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liow MHL, Goh GS-H, Wong MK, et al. (2017) Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2942–2951. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lundgren LS, Willems N, Marchand RC, et al. (2024) Surgical factors play a critical role in predicting functional outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12302. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shatrov J, Battelier C, Sappey-Marinier E, et al. (2022) Functional alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty – rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning. SICOT J 8, 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jeffrey M, Marchand P, Kouyoumdjian P, Coulomb R (2024) Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. SICOT J 10, 2. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vermue H, Batailler C, Monk P, et al. (2023) The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 3369–3381. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.