EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2024) SICOT-J, 10 (2024) 57 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 57
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024057
Published online 20 December 2024
  1. Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA (2009) Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 2895–2900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC (2013) Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95, 1760–1768. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M (2005) Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87, 762–769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA (2001) Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16, 715–720. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC (2003) Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4), 56–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Abdel MP, Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD (2016) What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAz are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474, 386–391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ishida T, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Iwamoto N, Yukizawa Y, Choe H, Saito T (2011) Changes in pelvic tilt following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 16, 682–688. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60, 217–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR (2011) The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 319–329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pichl J, Kremer M, Hoffmann R (2011) Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt. Z Orthop Unfall 149, 510–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tannast M, Langlotz F, Kubiak-Langer M (2005) Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopy-guided acetabular cup placement. Comput Aided Surg 10, 329–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Archbold HAP, Mockford B, Molloy D, et al. (2006) The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88-B, 883–886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY (2014) Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 329–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R (2015) Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 25, 531–536. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE (2015) Does robotic-assisted computer navigation affect acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty in the obese patient? A comparison study. J Arthroplasty 30, 2204–2207. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mathew G, Agha R, Group STROCSS (2021) STROCSS 2021: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 72, 103026. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445, 181–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN (2000) Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines, , 2nd edn, London: BMJ Books. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wines AP, McNicol D (2006) Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21, 696. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parratte S, Argenson JN (2007) Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89, 494–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bhaskar D, Rajpura A, Board T (2017) Current concepts in acetabular positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 51, 386–396. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nodzo SR, Chang CC, Carroll KM, Barlow BT, Banks SA, Padgett DE, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA (2018) Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study. Bone Joint J 100(10), 1303–1309. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kanawade V, Dorr LD, Banks SA (2015) Precision of robotic guided instrumentation for acetabular component positioning. J Arthroplasty 30, 392–397. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kong X, Yang M, Jerabek S (2020) A retrospective study comparing a single surgeon’s experience on manual versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty after the learning curve of the latter procedure – a cohort study. Int J Surg 77, 174–180. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lu H, Xiao Q, Xu H (2023) Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 608. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grammatopoulos G, Innmann M, Phan P (2023) Spinopelvic challenges in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 8, 298–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shareghi B, Mohaddes M, Kärrholm J (2021) Pelvic tilt between supine and standing after total hip arthroplasty an RSA up to seven years after the operation. J Orthop Res 39, 121–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Heckmann ND, Plaskos C, Wakelin EA (2024) Excessive posterior pelvic tilt from preoperative supine to postoperative standing after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 106-B(3 Supple A), 74–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.