Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 8
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024054
Published online 20 January 2025
  1. Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the US, 2014 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg 100(17), 1455–1460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sheth NP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK (2017) Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25(5), 348–357. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Graichen H, Haddad F (2015) Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 97(2), 147–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang J, Hsu C, Huang C, Lin P, Chen W (2013) Reconstruction using femoral head allograft in revision total knee replacement: an experience in Asian patients. Bone Jt J 95(5), 643–648. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR (2006) Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446, 83–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA (2001) The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16(6), 759–767. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vasiliadis AV, Lording T, Canetti R, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C (2023) How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees. SICOT-J 9, 15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Patel AR, Barlow B, Ranawat AS (2015) Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8, 407–412. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cance N, Batailler C, Canetti R, Servien E, Lustig S (2023) Tibial tubercule osteotomy during the revision of total knee arthroplasty: the technique of a referral center with 10 years of experience. SICOT-J 9, 18. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Engh G, Ammeen D (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48, 167–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hochman MG, Melenevsky YV, Metter DF, Roberts CC, Bencardino JT, Cassidy RC, Fox MG, Kransdorf MJ, Mintz DN, Shah NA, Small KM (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® imaging after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Coll Radiol 14(11), S421–S448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morgan RL, Whaley P, Thayer KA, Schünemann HJ (2018) Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ Int 121(Pt 1), 1027. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mann-Whitney U (2017) Test calculator, Statistics Kingdom. https://www.statskingdom.com/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M, Hopkins S (2004) The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(7), 119–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shannon BD, Klassen JF, Rand JA, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT (2003) Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems. J Arthroplasty 18, 27–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wood GC, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Bourne RB (2009) Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3), 810–817. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2015) A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1), 185–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mabry TM, Vessely MB, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ (2007) Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22(6), 100–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whaley AL, Trousdale RT, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (2003) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18(5), 592–599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim Y-H, Kim J-S (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg 91(6), 1440–1447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shichman I, Oakley C, Willems JH, van Hellemondt GG, Heesterbeek P, Rozell J, Marwin S, Schwarzkopf R (2023) Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(3), 1537–1547. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacquet C, Ros F, Guy S, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson J-N (2021) Trabecular metal cones combined with short cemented stem allow favorable outcomes in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty 36(2), 657–663. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Piuzzi NS, Hampp EL, Shi S, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Huffman N, Denehy KM, Markel DC, Li DD, Mont MA (2024) Short-term comparison of survivorship and functional outcomes for metaphyseal cones with short and long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 37(11), 765–772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Abu-Mukh A, Placella G, Anzano F, Mosca S, Salini V, Alessio-Mazzola M (2023) Tibia periprosthetic fracture management – a 30-year systematic review. Health Sci Rev 9, 100133. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.