EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 18 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 13
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025010
Published online 19 March 2025
  1. Manning D, Chiang P, Freiberg A (2005) Hinge implants. In: Revision total knee arthroplasty (pp. 219–236). New York, NY: Springer New York. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pasquier G, Ehlinger M, Mainard D (2019) The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 4(6), 269–278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Athwal K, Hunt N, Davies A (2014) Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 29(2), 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodriguez-Merchan E (2019) Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints: indications and results. EFORT Open Rev 4(4), 121–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Sandoval-Garcia M (2010) Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(5), 1248–1253. [Google Scholar]
  6. Neuhaus H, Maier K (2022) Rotating hinge prosthesis for primary and revision knee arthroplasty: comparison and indications. Biomed Res Int 2022(1), 9930675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pour A, Parvizi J, Slenker N (2007) Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg 89(8), 1735–1741. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vasso M, Beaufils P, Panni A (2013) Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(7), 1279–1284. [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrack R, Lyons T, Ingraham R, Johnson J (2000) The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthrop 15(7), 858–866. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yeroushalmi D, Laarhoven S, Tang A, Heesterbeek P, Hellemondt G, Schwarzkopf R (2022) Short to midterm outcomes of a novel guided-motion rotational hinged total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 35, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stroobant L, De Taeye T, Byttebier P, Van Onsem S, Jacobs E, Burssens A, Victor J (2023) Condylar constrained and rotating hinged implants in revision knee arthroplasty show similar survivorship and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31(12), 5365–5380. [Google Scholar]
  12. Efe T, Roessler P, Heyse T, Hauk C, Pahrmann C, Getgood A, Schmitt J (2012) Mid-term results after implantation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses: primary versus revision. Orthop Rev 4(4), e35. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Rosso F, Crova M (2012) Rotating-hinge total knee for revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 35(3), 325–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perrin D, Turgeon T (2020) Guided-motion hinged knee replacement prosthesis: early survival rate and postoperative patient function and satisfaction. Can J Surg 63(3), 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abdulkarim A, Keane A, Hu S, Glen L, Murphy D (2019) Rotating-hinge knee prosthesis as a viable option in primary surgery: literature review & meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(7), 1351–1359. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen M, Hung J, Chang C, Lee S, Shih H, Chang Y (2020) Periprosthetic knee infection reconstruction with a hinged prosthesis: implant survival and risk factors for treatment failure. Knee 27(3), 1035–1042. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shen C, Lichstein P, Austin M, Sharkey P, Parvizi J (2014) Revision knee arthroplasty for bone loss: choosing the right degree of constraint. J Arthrop 29(1), 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pradhan N, Bale L, Kay P, Porter M (2004) Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model® rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee 11(6), 469–473. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee S, Kim I, Moon Y (2023) Clinical outcomes and infection rates following revision total knee arthroplasty: aseptic failure versus septic failure. Clin Orthop Surg 15(4), 574–580. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ro D, Kim J, Kim S, Han H, Lee M (2018) Periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude good outcomes after a revision total knee arthroplasty: a 7-year follow-up study of 144 retrospective cases. BioMed Res Int 2018(1), 2582140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lim J, Pang H, Tay K, Chia S, Lo N, Yeo S (2020) Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 529–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luttjeboer J, Benard M, Defoort K, Hellemondt G, Wymenga A (2016) Revision total knee arthroplasty for instability–outcome for different types of instability and implants. J Arthrop 31(12), 2672–2676. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoon J, Cheong J, Im J (2019) Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. PLoS One 14(3), e0214279. [Google Scholar]
  24. Caplan N, Kader D (2013) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics, pp. 193–195. [Google Scholar]
  25. Laarhoven S, Te Molder M, Van Hellemondt G, Heesterbeek P (2023) Acceptable migration of a fully cemented rotating hinge-type knee revision system measured in 20 patients with model-based RSA with a 2-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 94, 185–190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Farid Y, Thakrai R, Finn H (2015) Intermediate-term results of 142 single-design, rotating-hinge implants: frequent complications may not preclude salvage of severely affected knees. J Arthrop 30(12), 2173–2180. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zinno R, Paolo S, Ambrosino G, Alesi D, Zaffagnini S, Barone G, Bragonzoni L (2020) Migration of the femoral component and clinical outcomes after total knee replacement: a narrative review. Musculoskelet Surg 105(3), 25–246. [Google Scholar]
  28. Daher M, Mekhael E, El-Othmani M (2024) Osteoporosis in the setting of knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Arthroplasty 6(1), 50. [Google Scholar]
  29. Howard K, Miller M, Damron T, Mann K (2015) The distribution of implant fixation for femoral components of TKA: a postmortem retrieval study. J Arthrop 29(9), 1863–1870. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang J, Zhang H, Tian D, Wang F, Zhang H, Hu Y (2021) Spherical center axial hinge knee prosthesis causes lower contact stress on tibial insert and bushing compared with biaxial hinge knee prosthesis. Knee 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Samiezadeh S, Bougherara H, Abolghasemian M, D’Lima D, Backstein D (2018) Rotating hinge knee causes lower bone–implant interface stress compared to constrained condylar knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1224–1231. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang J, Zhang H, Tian D, Wang F, Ren Z, Hu Y (2020) Comparative assessment of biomechanics induced by hinge knee prostheses with two different motion axial system. Artif Organs 45(6), 608–615. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lorenz A, Winter A, Mederake M, Friedhager C, Hofmann U, Leichtle U (2023) Changes in femoral rollback and rotation with increasing coupling in knee arthroplasty-a biomechanical in-vitro study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24(1), 341. [Google Scholar]
  34. Freisenbichler J, Glehr M, Sadoghi P, Maurer-Ertl W, Ott F, Leithner A (2012) In vivo testing of knee stability after rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 knee systems. Orthopedics 25(3), e335–e342. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guttowski D, Polster V, Huber G, Morlock M, Puschel K, Nuchtern J (2020) Comparative biomechanical in vitro study of different modular total knee arthroplasty revision stems with bone defects. J Arthrop 35(11), 3318–3325. [Google Scholar]
  36. Maslaris A, Tsiridis E, Schoeneberg C, Pass B, Spyrou G, Maris A, Matziolis G (2023) Does stem profile have an impact on failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 1549–1569. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rodriguez-Merchan E, Gomez-Cardero P, Encinas-Ullan C (2021) Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results. EFORT Open Rev 6(11), 1073–1086. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kendoff D, Haasper C, Gehrke T, Klauser W, Sandiford N (2020) Management of gonarthrosis with a rotating hinge prosthesis: minimum 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg 12(4), 464–469. [Google Scholar]
  39. Castagnini F, Bordini B, Costenino M, Ancarani C, Lucchini S, Bracci G, et al. (2022) Constraint in complex primary total knee arthroplasty: rotating hinge versus condylar constrained implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(12), 3965–3973. [Google Scholar]
  40. Baker P, Critchley R, Gray A, Jameson S, Gregg P, Port A, Deehan D (2012) Mid-term survival following primary hinged total knee replacement is good irrespective of the indication for surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(3), 599–608. [Google Scholar]
  41. Knight M, Lewis P, Peng Y, Hatton A, Parkinson B (2020) Survivorship of highly constrained prosthesis in primary and total knee arthroplasty: analysis of 6070 cases. ANZ J Surg 90(10), 2061–2067. [Google Scholar]
  42. Badawy M, Fenstad A, Furnes O (2019) Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 90(5), 467–472. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu J, Fritsch L, Sabah S (2022) Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review. Knee Surg Relat Res 34(1), 9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Guenon B, Latargez L, Freslon M, Defossez G, Salas N, Gavet L (2009) Complications following rotating hinge Endo-Modell (Link®) knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(7), 529–536. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Cottino U, Abdel M, Perry K, Mara K, Lewallen D, Hanssen A (2017) Long-term results after total knee arthroplasty with contemporary rotating-hinge prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15(99), 324–330. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kearns S, Culp B, Bohl D, Sporer S, Valle D, Levine B (2018) Rotating hinge implants for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthrop 33(3), 766–770. [Google Scholar]
  47. Caron E, Gabrion A, Ehlinger M (2021) Complications and failures of non tumoral hinged total kene arthroplasty im primary and aseptic revision surgery: a review of 290 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107(3), 102875. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Encinas-Ullan C, Gomez-Cardero P, Ruiz-Perez J (2021) Dislocation of rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 6(2), 107–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang J, Li E, Zhang Y (2022) Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: 1 basic science and principles. EFORT Open Rev 7(2), 174–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Green C, Stelzer J, Kerr M, Tang A, Menken L, Romanelli F, Miller J, Liporace F, Haidukewych G, Yoon R (2023) Risk factors for revision surgery following revision total knee arthroplasty using a hinged knee prosthesis for septic and aseptic indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 31(19), 798–814. [Google Scholar]
  51. Al Hassan M, Salem O, Alabsi E (2022) Dislocation of rotating hinged knee prostheses in a patient with extensor mechanism dysfunction. Cureus 14(4), e24091. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.