Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025033
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. Meek RMD, Allan DB, McPhillips G, et al. (2006) Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36, 511–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, et al. (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Rel Res® 467, 465. [Google Scholar]
  4. Villatte G, Erivan R, Barth J, et al. (2020) Progression and projection for shoulder surgery in France, 2012–2070: Epidemiologic study with trend and projection analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo L, Yang Y, An B, et al. (2017) Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 38, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ren X, Ling L, Qi L, et al. (2021) Patients’ risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 40 studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 776. [Google Scholar]
  7. Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, et al. (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95, 407–413. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McAlister IP, Perry KI, Mara KC, et al. (2019) Two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty for infection is associated with a high rate of dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101, 322–329. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sayac G, Neri T, Schneider L, et al. (2020) Low revision rates at more than 10 years for dual-mobility cups cemented into cages in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35, 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zadel N, Cazorla C, Carricajo A, et al. (2025) Two-stage exchange of infected total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup is associated with a low instability rate. SICOT J 11, 19. [Google Scholar]
  11. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 33, 1309–1314-e2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 965–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartman CW, Garvin KL (2006) Dislocation of the hip after reimplantation for infection: an analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  14. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Mallory TH, et al. (2005) The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures. J Arthroplasty 20, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim F, et al. (2012) Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J 8, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  16. Unter Ecker N, Kocaoğlu H, Zahar A, et al. (2021) What is the dislocation and revision rate of dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THAs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 479, 280–285. [Google Scholar]
  17. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84, 1788–1792. [Google Scholar]
  18. Garceau S, Warschawski Y, Sanders E, et al. (2019) Impact of hip antibiotic spacer dislocation on final implant position and outcomes. J Arthroplasty 34, 2107–2110. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chalmers BP, Mabry TM, Abdel MP, et al. (2018) Two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty with a specific articulating antibiotic spacer design: reliable periprosthetic joint infection eradication and functional improvement. J Arthroplasty 33, 3746–3753. [Google Scholar]
  20. Drexler M, Kuzyk PRT, Koo K, et al. (2016) The use of a supra-acetabular antibiotic-loaded cement shelf to improve hip stability in first-stage infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31, 2574–2578. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zwartelé RE, Brand R, Doets HC (2004) Increased risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: a prospective observational study of 410 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 75, 684–690. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neri T, Philippot R, Farizon F, Boyer B (2017) Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips. Int Orthop 41, 557–561. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.