Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 40
Number of page(s) 7
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026034
Published online 24 June 2026
  1. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12), 2143–2149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, et al. (2012) Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(6), 1177–1182. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL, et al. (2019) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A review. Bone Joint J 101-B(1), 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  4. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. (2020) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: A realistic or achievable goal? J Arthroplasty 25(4), 506–513. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim K, Kim J, Lee D (2019) The accuracy of alignment determined by patient-specific instrumentation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 31(1), 17. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kort NP (2016) Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: Accuracy and initial clinical experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(2), 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hafez MA, Moholkar K (2020) Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: Rationale and current outcomes. Orthop Surg 12(1), 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  8. Watters TS, Mather RC, Browne JA, et al. (2011) Analysis of outcomes and cost-effectiveness of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26(8), 1443–1449. [Google Scholar]
  9. MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, et al. (2020) Alignment and clinical outcomes in conventional, computer-navigated, robotic, and patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(4), 1135–1147. [Google Scholar]
  10. Goh GS, Liow MHL, Lim WS, et al. (2018) Patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment and functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 33(1), 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guezou-Philippe A, Clavé A, Maguet E, et al. (2024) Fully automated workflow for the design of patient-specific orthopaedic implants: Application to total knee arthroplasty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15353. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15353. [Google Scholar]
  12. Edelstein AI, Bhatt S, Wright-Chisem J, et al. (2020) The effect of implant design on sagittal plane stability: A randomized trial of medial- versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 33(5), 452–458. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gray HA, Guan S, Young TJ, et al. (2020) Comparison of posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, and medial-stabilized knee implant motion during gait. J Orthop Res 38(8), 1753–1768. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nizam I, Batra AV. (2018) Accuracy of bone resection in total knee arthroplasty using CT assisted-3D printed patient specific cutting guides. SICOT J. 4, 29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kerr DR, Kohan L (2008) Local infiltration analgesia: A technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: A case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop 79(2), 174–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Abane L, Antract P, Boisgard S, et al. (2015) A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97-B, 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitzpatrick DC, et al. (2018) Constitutional varus and valgus in TKA: Implications for surgery and functional outcomes. J Knee Surg 31(7), 622–628. [Google Scholar]
  18. Giffin JR, et al. (2017) The influence of preoperative knee alignment on postoperative function and alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 475(5), 1255–1262. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bauer M, et al. (2017) The impact of constitutional alignment on post-operative functional outcomes in TKA. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 25(8), 1207–1213. [Google Scholar]
  20. Patel S, et al. (2020). Outcome differences in TKA patients with constitutional varus and valgus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(4), 683–690. [Google Scholar]
  21. Epinette JA, et al. (2021). Influence of soft tissue balancing on outcomes in TKA. Orthopedic Clin North Am 52(2), 161–171. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim H, Lee S, Lee D, et al. (2020) The effect of patient-specific instrumentation on the functional outcomes in patients with severe knee deformities. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(5), 923–931. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dwyer T, Sullivan R, Betts H, et al. (2019) Comparison of functional outcomes of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34(7), 1545–1550. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moyer R, Greenberg P, McLaughlin T, et al. (2020) The durability and functional outcomes of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(12), 1057–1064. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hernandez M, et al. (2020) Constitutional alignment in TKA and its impact on mechanical axis and functional outcomes. J Arthroplasty 35(11), 3184–3190. [Google Scholar]
  26. Carli A, Rehal A, Westrich G, et al. (2019). Mechanical axis deviation in patients with constitutional varus: The challenge of correction in TKA. J Bone Jt Surg 101(4), 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi YJ, Seo SS, Moon YW, et al. (2021). Outlier alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty 36(8), 2960–2965. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang WL, Camarda L, D'Arienzo A, et al. (2016). Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg 98(11), 968–975. [Google Scholar]
  29. Seo JW, Park KK, Kwon SK, et al. (2020). The role of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: A review of current evidence. Knee Surg Rel Res 32(3), 181–188. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.