EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 1 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 7
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025056
Published online 22 January 2026
  1. Dretakis K, Igoumenou VG, Naoum S, et al. (2024) Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: anatomical alignment and mid-term outcomes from the first cohort originating in Greece. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 34, 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  2. Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, et al. (2018) Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33, 2002–2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aggarwal VA, Sun J, Sambandam SN (2024) Outcomes following robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 2223–2227. [Google Scholar]
  4. Charette RS, Sarpong NO, Weiner TR, et al. (2022) Registration of bony landmarks and soft tissue laxity during robotic total knee arthroplasty is highly reproducible. Surg Technol Int 41, sti41/1633. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dretakis K, Koutserimpas C (2024) Pitfalls with the MAKO robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Medicina (Kaunas) 60, 262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diquattro E, Prill R, Salzmann M, et al. (2024) High three-dimensional accuracy of component placement and lower limb alignment using a robotic arm-assisted system and gap-balancing instrument in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 32, 685–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kayani B, Fontalis A, Haddad IC, et al. (2023) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with comparable functional outcomes but improved forgotten joint scores compared with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty at five-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 5453–5462. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi BS, Kim SE, Yang M, et al. (2023) Functional alignment with robotic‑arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated better patient-reported outcomes than mechanical alignment with manual total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 1072–1080. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, Andriollo L, et al. (2025) Comparable outcomes between cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilized inserts in robotic total knee arthroplasty under the functional alignment principles. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 605–2613. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, Giovanoulis V, et al. (2025) Functional alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformity achieves safe coronal alignment and excellent short-term outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(6), 2187–2196. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andriollo L, Benazzo F, Cinelli V, et al. (2024) The use of an imageless robotic system in revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 1792–1803. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mancino F, Fontalis A, Grandhi TSP, et al. (2024) Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 106-B, 680–687. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalavrytinos D, Koutserimpas C, Kalavrytinos I, Dretakis K (2020) Expanding robotic arm-assisted knee surgery: the first attempt to use the system for knee revision arthroplasty. Case Rep Orthop 2020, 4806987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koutserimpas C, Favroul C, Batailler C, et al. (2024) Is bicortical femoral pin insertion safe for Image-based Robotic Knee Arthroplasty Surgery? A comparative complications analysis in 970 Consecutive Cases. J ISAKOS 10, 100317. [Google Scholar]
  15. Migliorini F, Bosco F, Schäfer L, et al. (2024) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 985. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tay ML, Young SW, Frampton CM, Hooper GJ (2022) The lifetime revision risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 104-B, 672–679. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shatrov J, Battelier C, Sappey-Marinier E, et al. (2022) Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty – Rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning. SICOT J 8, 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, De Fazio A, et al. (2025) Functional knee positioning in patients with valgus deformity undergoing image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: Surgical technique. SICOT J 11, 7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Andriollo L, Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, et al. (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty – Part 2: Combined flexion does not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 2939–2949. [Google Scholar]
  20. Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty – Part 1: Variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 2928–2938. [Google Scholar]
  21. Koutserimpas C, Andriollo L, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Revisiting terminology: The transition from “functional alignment” to “functional knee positioning”. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 1948–1953. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koutserimpas C, Garibaldi R, Olivier F, et al. (2025) Tibial implant varus >3° does not adversely affect outcomes or revision rates in functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty in a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar]
  23. Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, Andriollo L, et al. (2025) Impact of high body mass index on functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: comparable functional outcomes but higher mechanical failures. J ISAKOS 12, 100861. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, Veizi E, et al. (2025) Cementless versus cemented fixation in image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty guided by functional knee positioning principles. SICOT J 11, 32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tay ML, McGlashan SR, Monk AP, Young SW (2022) Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 301–314. [Google Scholar]
  26. Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90 of flexion impacts clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 2581–2591. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bertugli E, Zambianchi F, Batailler C, et al. (2024) Change of CPAK class does not affect functional outcomes in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with functional alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 1773–1783. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chang JS, Kayani B, Wallace C, Haddad FS (2021) Functional alignment achieves soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 103-B, 507–514. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jenny J-Y, Baldairon F (2023) The coronal plane alignment of the knee classification does not correlate with the functional knee phenotype classification. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 3906–3911. [Google Scholar]
  30. Koutserimpas C, Andriollo L, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Robotic total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment yields comparable outcomes across age and gender groups. J ISAKOS 14, 100930. [Google Scholar]
  31. Koutserimpas C, Caria C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Functional alignment in robotic total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable outcomes in varus and valgus knees despite distinct intraoperative strategies: Analysis of 355 consecutive cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12764. [Google Scholar]
  32. Koutserimpas C, Mazzella GG, Andriollo L, et al. (2025) Preoperative flexion contracture does not impair outcomes or early revision rates following robotic total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12799. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee JK, Kim HJ, Park JO, Yang J-H (2018) Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 3403–3418. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koutserimpas C, Saffarini M, Bonnin M, et al. (2024) Optimizing the patellofemoral compartment in total knee arthroplasty: Is it time for dynamic assessment? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 387–392. [Google Scholar]
  35. Batailler C, Greiner S, Rekik H-L, et al. (2024) Intraoperative patellar tracking assessment during image-based robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: technical note and reliability study. SICOT J 10, 44. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sangaletti R, Montagna A, Calandra G, et al. (2025) Robotic functional alignment in knee arthroplasty minimizes impact on ankle alignment: Role of MPTA and LDFA preservation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 2222–2229. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rossi SMP, Sangaletti R, Andriollo L, et al. (2024) The use of a modern robotic system for the treatment of severe knee deformities. Technol Health Care 32, 3737–3746. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.