Volume 3, 2017
Special Issue: "Musculoskeletal tumors: Current approaches and controversies" Guest Editor: A. Kulidjian
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Published online||21 February 2017|
Upper extremity sarcoma: impact of current practice guidelines and controversies on reconstructive approaches
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
2 Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany , the affiliated Department of ptastic surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Germany
*Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Accepted: 1 January 2017
The goals of sarcoma management include both a cure and the functional preservation of involved tissues and adjacent critical structures with common opinions favoring immediate reconstruction. The question arises whether these goals are contradictory. This paper discusses the question based on the experience of 28 patients with different types of extremity sarcoma, with 24 surgically treated by the University of California San Diego (UCSD) orthopedic and plastic surgery team (2011–2016) and the collection of evidence from published practice guidelines, reviews, case studies, and clinical trials. Included are the impact of limb-sparing and functional reconstructive concepts, efforts regarding the adequacy of surgical margins, and the rationale of immediate versus delayed reconstructive approaches, and the disease-free status of sarcoma management.
Key words: Oncological upper extremity defect / Margins / Immediate reconstruction / Delayed reconstruction / Sarcoma
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.