Volume 3, 2017
|Number of page(s)||4|
|Published online||22 November 2017|
Does smoking affect the outcomes of lumbar decompression surgery?
Plymouth University Penisula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Tamar Science Park, Research Way, Plymouth, Devon
PL6 8DH, UK
2 Southwest Neurosurgery Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
* Corresponding author: email@example.com
Accepted: 7 September 2017
Introduction: Lumbar decompressions and micro-discectomies are commonly performed non-complex spinal surgeries that do not involve the insertion of metalwork into the spine and are done for symptomatic disc prolapse and lumbar spinal stenosis, whereas complex-spinal surgery does require metalwork . Studies of complex-spinal surgeries show that smoking has a significant negative impact on the outcome of the surgery  therefore, the cessation of smoking is advised prior to surgery . There are evidences in the literature supportive as well as opposing this statement about continued smoking and poor outcome of decompressive spinal surgeries.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 143 consecutive patients who have had either a micro-discectomy or a micro-decompression.
Results: We found no statistical difference between smokers and non-smokers in the outcomes of lumbar decompression surgery. Both groups improved equally and significantly in terms of back pain, leg pain and functions. Out of 143 patients, only 2% more non-smokers had improved leg pain compared to smokers, 1% less non-smokers had improved back pain and 2% more non-smokers had an improved Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score.
Discussion: We recommend that it is important to surgically treat both smokers and non-smokers in need of a lumbar spinal decompression.
Key words: Micro-discectomy / Spinal decompression / Smoking / Non-complex spinal surgery
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.