Review Article

Autofusion in growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis; what do we know so far?

¹ Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
² Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt

^* Corresponding author: amrhatemhassan@aun.edu.eg

Received: 19 February 2024
Accepted: 20 March 2024

Abstract

The evolving landscape of early onset scoliosis management has shifted from the traditional paradigm of early definitive spinal fusion towards modern growth-friendly implants, particularly Growing Rods (GR). Despite the initial classification of GR treatment as a fusionless procedure, the phenomenon of autofusion has emerged as a critical consideration in understanding its outcomes. Studies have demonstrated the presence of autofusion since the early 1980s. The consequences of autofusion are extensive, impacting curve correction, diminishing trunk growth rate, and contributing to the “law of diminishing returns” in growing rod surgery. The literature suggests that autofusion may complicate definitive fusion surgery, leading to prolonged and intricate procedures involving multiple osteotomies. Additionally, it poses challenges in identifying anatomical landmarks during surgery, potentially increasing the risk of complications and revisions. While autofusion poses challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in growing rod treatment, it cannot be considered a standalone replacement for definitive fusion. Recent advances aim to limit autofusion and enhance treatment outcomes. In this review, we will delve into the existing literature on autofusion, examining studies that have documented its presence, probable causes, pathophysiology, potential implications for long-term patient outcomes, and possible new implants and techniques that decrease its incidence.