Open Access
Review

Table 1

Baseline characteristic of included studies.

Study ID Study design Number of patients
Age
Gender, female
Intervention Study period Follow-up in months
TP AMP TP AMP TP AMP
Rogmark et al. [15] Observational study 1116 (64%) 616 (36%) 80 826 (74%) 462 (75%) TP/AMP HA 2005–2009 12
Tzanetis et al. [26] Observational study 137 (36%) 245 (64%) 79 77.5 103 (75%) 196 (80%) TP/AMP HA 1986–1977 36/96
Parker et al. [23] RCT 200 (50%) 200 (50%) 83 83 161 (80%) 147 (73%) TP/AMP HA 2001–2006 6
Weinrauch et al. [27] Observational study 738 (66%) 380 (34%) NA NA TP/AMP HA 1998–2003 32/36
Singh and Deshmukh [1] Observational study 25 (64%) 29 (54%) 84 83 21 (84%) 25 (86.2%) TP/AMP HA 1999–2000 12
Foster et al. [24] Observational study 174 (71%) 70 (29%) 80 83 138 (79.3%) 52 (74.28%) TP/AMP HA 2001–2002 NA
Shewale et al. [25] Observational study 100 (50%) 100 (50%) 84.3 85.4 87 (87%) 87 (87%) TP/AMP HA Over two years 24
Harper.and Gregg [2] RCT 77 (54%) 66 (46%) 83 143 (100%) TP/AMP HA NA 12
Emery et al. [10] RCT 27 (51%) 26 (49%) 78 79.6 24 (89%) 22 (85%) TP/AMP HA NA 17
Dorr et al. [8] RCT 37 (74%) 13 (26%) 72 66 26 (70%) 9 (69%) TP/AMP HA 1980–1982 24/48

AMP, Austin Moore prosthesis; HA, hemiarthroplasty; NA, not available; RCT, randomized controlled trials; TP, Thompson prosthesis.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.