Open Access
Review
Table 1
Baseline characteristic of included studies.
Study ID | Study design | Number of patients |
Age |
Gender, female |
Intervention | Study period | Follow-up in months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP | AMP | TP | AMP | TP | AMP | |||||
Rogmark et al. [15] | Observational study | 1116 (64%) | 616 (36%) | 80 | 826 (74%) | 462 (75%) | TP/AMP HA | 2005–2009 | 12 | |
Tzanetis et al. [26] | Observational study | 137 (36%) | 245 (64%) | 79 | 77.5 | 103 (75%) | 196 (80%) | TP/AMP HA | 1986–1977 | 36/96 |
Parker et al. [23] | RCT | 200 (50%) | 200 (50%) | 83 | 83 | 161 (80%) | 147 (73%) | TP/AMP HA | 2001–2006 | 6 |
Weinrauch et al. [27] | Observational study | 738 (66%) | 380 (34%) | NA | NA | TP/AMP HA | 1998–2003 | 32/36 | ||
Singh and Deshmukh [1] | Observational study | 25 (64%) | 29 (54%) | 84 | 83 | 21 (84%) | 25 (86.2%) | TP/AMP HA | 1999–2000 | 12 |
Foster et al. [24] | Observational study | 174 (71%) | 70 (29%) | 80 | 83 | 138 (79.3%) | 52 (74.28%) | TP/AMP HA | 2001–2002 | NA |
Shewale et al. [25] | Observational study | 100 (50%) | 100 (50%) | 84.3 | 85.4 | 87 (87%) | 87 (87%) | TP/AMP HA | Over two years | 24 |
Harper.and Gregg [2] | RCT | 77 (54%) | 66 (46%) | 83 | 143 (100%) | TP/AMP HA | NA | 12 | ||
Emery et al. [10] | RCT | 27 (51%) | 26 (49%) | 78 | 79.6 | 24 (89%) | 22 (85%) | TP/AMP HA | NA | 17 |
Dorr et al. [8] | RCT | 37 (74%) | 13 (26%) | 72 | 66 | 26 (70%) | 9 (69%) | TP/AMP HA | 1980–1982 | 24/48 |
AMP, Austin Moore prosthesis; HA, hemiarthroplasty; NA, not available; RCT, randomized controlled trials; TP, Thompson prosthesis.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.