EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2023) SICOT-J, 9 (2023) 7 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 6
Section Wrist & Hand
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023004
Published online 07 April 2023

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Scaphoid fractures account for 60% of carpal bone fractures and nonunion rates may reach up to 15% [1].

Degree of fracture displacement together with proximal fractures and scaphoid avascular necrosis (AVN) are considered risks for nonunion. Also, the presence of carpal instability or delayed cast immobilization may lead to nonunion as well [2].

Failure of achievement of the union after surgical intervention results in loss of available bone stock with long-term complications in the form of scaphoid deformity. The use of large-sized screws adds to bone stock resorption, with the risk of articular injury in case of implant migration. If a local vascularized grafting has been used with the fixation method the achievement of union may be a discarded idea and thoughts will be directed toward limited carpal fusions [3].

The free vascularized graft may represent a good option in persistent scaphoid nonunion, especially in those who show no signs of SNAC in X-rays and Ct or are accompanied by AVN [3, 4].

Grafts from the MFC represent an appropriate method in the management of failed scaphoid fixation especially those with an avascular proximal pole [5].

A medial femoral condyle graft is a corticoperiosteal pedicled graft the vascularity of which is obtained from descending genicular artery (DGA) and vein articular branch or superomedial genicular vessels [5]. This technique gained increased interest due to its rich vascular anatomy [6]. MFC graft can provide adequate structural support when used volarly with the improvement of union rates and scapholunate angles [7].

Current literature provides limited data regarding the results of vascularized grafts from the MFC in the management of non-united scaphoid fractures after failed previous fixation. This study aims at evaluating the short-term results and union rates of free vascularized MFC grafting as a treatment option for persistent scaphoid nonunions after failed previous surgical attempts.

Materials and methods

This study is a retrospective series including 16 patients (6 females and 10 males) with recalcitrant nonunions of scaphoid fractures treated with free MFC vascularized grafting over 3 years (from 2019 to 2022) at Ain shams university hospitals. Follow-up was mean 24 months (range 6–30). The mean age was 37.4 yrs (27–49 yrs). The time since the last surgical fixation attempt was 1 yr (0–3yrs). Any patient with SNAC was excluded.

For preoperative evaluation, medical and surgical history together with local clinical examination were obtained from all patients, and data was collected about previous surgical interventions. Plain X-rays of the affected wrist were done in three different views (PA-LAT-Scaphoid) CT scan and MRI were done if needed. After the tourniquet release, the absence of punctuated bleeding of the scaphoid bone confirmed the AVN diagnosis.

Surgical technique: All patients received general anesthesia and were positioned supine with the operated limb placed on the side table. At the same time, we prepared ipsilateral L.L. from the thigh distally. Ipsilateral L.L. grafts are preferred to allow working simultaneously on both U.L. and L.L., also this makes it easier to use walking aids with the contralateral limb postoperatively. The operation was done under a tourniquet.

The extended anterior Russe approach was used for scaphoid exposure, graft application and vascular anastomosis. Incision made over flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon extending 8 cm proximally with mild radial curve distal to the wrist crease towards trapezium. The sheath of FCR was dissected with tendon retraction ulnarly, fascia was dissected longitudinally to expose the radiocarpal capsule over the scaphoid bone. The scaphoid fracture site was exposed with the removal of any retained implants. Refreshing of the nonunion site was done with the removal of any fibrous or necrotic tissues followed by an evaluation of the size of the present defect.

The femoral graft is then harvested from the ipsilateral lower limb. Under tourniquet using a distal thigh medial approach, starting from the medial joint line and extending 20 cm proximally. Deep fascia was dissected with retraction of the vastus medialis muscle anteriorly exposing the medial femoral condyle with an exploration of the DGA branching from SFA or the medial superior genicular artery branching from the popliteal artery. The vascular pedicle of chosen artery and vein was dissected in sufficient length. The bone graft of adequate size is then harvested with the division of the explored pedicle.

The recipient site is then prepared with exposure of the radial artery and its vena comitans, followed by graft application after its adjustment according to defect morphology with fixation using screws or k-wires (Figures 1–3).

thumbnail Figure 1

a) Preoperative PA wrist X-ray of non-united scaphoid fracture after fixation with Herbert screw. b) Postoperative X-ray after revision fixation using vascularized MFC graft and refixation. c) Follow-up X-ray showing full scaphoid union.

thumbnail Figure 2

a) Postoperative PA wrist X-ray of revision fixation of non-united scaphoid using k wires and vascularized MFC graft. b) Follow-up X-ray. c) X-ray after wires removal showing full scaphoid union.

thumbnail Figure 3

a) Preoperative PA wrist X-ray of no-nunited scaphoid fixed with Herbert screw. b) Follow-up X-ray showing full union after revision fixation using MFC graft.

The vascular anastomosis was done using surgical magnifying glasses (Loupes) to the radial artery using end-to-side or end-to-end technique into the radial artery palmar branch using 9-0 sutures. A similar anastomosis technique was used for venous anastomosis to a cephalic vein or vena comitans. Adequacy of vascular flow was then confirmed before wound closure with the use of a suction drain. Finally, the slab was done over the thumb in a neutral position (Figure 4).

thumbnail Figure 4

Intraoperative images, a) non-united scaphoid fracture site; b) harvesting vascularised MFC graft; c) graft with vascular pedicle; d) graft after vascular anastomosis.

Postoperatively thumb spica was kept for 6 weeks. Patients came for follow-up at 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks postoperatively and every month after that. Follow-up was mean 24 months (6–30 months). Stitches were removed after 2 weeks. Any wound complications or donor site morbidities were recorded.

Patients were assessed for scaphoid union by X-rays at every follow-up visit till the end of follow-up and confirmed by CT scan when needed. Interscaphoid and scapholunate angles were measured.

We recorded wrist ROM and grip strength. The pain was evaluated using a VAS score. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Mayo score. The patient’s functional satisfaction and working ability were recorded.

Regarding antibiotics protocol, all patients received a loading AB dose of 1st generation cephalosporins which was continued for 48 h postoperatively.

Results

Union was confirmed radiologically in 13 of the 16 reconstructed scaphoids (82%). The two cases that showed non-union had risk factors including heavy smoking and follow-up noncompliance with DM in one of them. The implant position was maintained in all cases till the last follow-up (Table 1).

Table 1

Preoperative and postoperative characteristics of patients in whom scaphoid nonunion failed to unite after mfc bone-grafting.

Considering functional evaluation VAS score improved from a mean of 6 preoperatively (from 3 to 9, SD = 1.9) to a mean of 2 postoperatively (from 0 to 4, SD = 1.6). This was statistically highly significant.

The final postoperative ROM: Flexion starting from neutral to a range from 38° to 72° with a mean of 52.31°, Extension starting from neutral to a range from 25° to 68° with a mean of 48.56°, Ulnar deviation starting from neutral to a range from 11° to 31° with a mean of 22.44° and Radial deviation starting from neutral to a range from 8° to 20° with a mean of 14.94°.

Mayo score: The preoperative score ranged from 10 to 70 with a mean of 45.63, and the final postoperative score ranged from 35 to 100 with a mean of 73.44. This improvement was statistically highly significant.

Complications

Complications were scaphoid non-union in three patients (Table 1), Saphenous nerve paresthesia in 2 patients (12.5%), postoperative donor site pain in 10 patients (62.5%), anterior knee pain in 5 patients (31.25%), radioscaphoid osteoarthritis in 2 patients and scaphoid proximal pole AVN in one patient (6.25%).

Discussion

Non-union of scaphoid fractures leads to several complications including degeneration of the wrist joint which is directly related to the degree of fracture displacement and the presence of associated carpal instability. Persistence of non-union after previous fixation attempts leads to a reduction of remaining bone stock and its quality, making further corrective surgery very difficult [8–10]. This study reported our results of the use of MFC-free vascularized bone grafting in the management of persistent non-union in scaphoid fractures after failed fixation which provided promising results in our study group.

This reconstruction method showed a good rate of scaphoid union in our group of patients (13 out of 16 showed full union 82%), good functional outcomes with the improvement of ROM and wrist pain, VAS score improved from 6 to 2, Mayo score improved from 45 to 73.

Our study limitations included limited the number of cases, and the absence of comparison between the results of this management technique and other treatment methods, these should be addressed in forthcoming studies.

The early appropriate treatment of scaphoid fractures is proven to provide improvement of patient’s symptoms and prevent complications and wrist arthritis, however, scaphoid fractures are frequently missed and neglected in up to 30% of cases evaluated with plain X-ray only [11].

Revision surgeries for scaphoid nonunion after failed fixation are challenging with questionable results. The reported results in the literature regarding these revision surgeries are highly diverse, with variable rates of the union from 50% to 100%. Such variation could be related to different techniques with different implants and different grafting methods, together with variable postoperative protocols. Vascularized grafts have shown the most favourable results in such revision surgeries in patients without SNAC wrist (Table 2 [6–15]).

Table 2

Outcomes of revision surgery for scaphoid nonunion with proximal pole osteonecrosis nonunion treated with MFC-free vascularized graft vascularized bone graft.

A study including 48 patients recorded a union rate of 82% in the management of persistent scaphoid nonunion after failed previous fixation with the use of vascularized or nonvascularized grafting according to fracture pattern [16]. However, this study did not record the presence of AVN, which plays an important role in successful treatment [17].

Another study by Smith and Cooney included 19 cases with failed scaphoid fixation and persistent nonunion, they reported union in 14 of the cases after using grafts whether vascularised or not. The conclusion is that the success of revision surgery depends on the appropriate choice of graft type according to fracture characteristics. Vascularised bone grafts provide a better outcomes in cases with proximal pole AVN [18].

A systematic review by Moon et al. included 19 studies evaluating revision scaphoid fixation using vascularised bone grafting in 184 cases, the rate of the union in all cases was about 86% [19].

Another study by Chang et al. reported that the use of 1,2 ICSRA pedicle graft provides a good outcome in cases with scaphoid AVN however is not sufficient in restoring the length of scaphoid and carpal bones alignment [12]. A more bulky vascularized graft with adequate cancellous bone and structural support may be needed. In 12 of 15 patients, the use of free iliac crest vascularized grafting was successful in achieving union in patients with AVN [20].

Free vascularized bone graft harvested from the medial femoral condyle was first used in the treatment of non-united metacarpals and forearm fractures [21]. Doi et al. reported the use of MFC vascularised onlay graft in the successful treatment of 10 cases with non-united scaphoids [13]. Also Jones et al. used MFC vascularised interposition structural grafts in the treatment of non-united scaphoids AVN and carpal collapse. Union rates in such 2 studies were 100% in 17 cases [22].

According to these previous results our study reported promising results with the healing of 13 out of 16 scaphoids after the second operation (82%), improvement in carpal height and postoperative S-L angle which reflects the improvement in scaphoid length and alignment. The use of a CT scan is considered to be an important method for management planning. It is useful for the evaluation of fracture healing and carpal degeneration. Such results were comparable to other mentioned studies evaluating such reconstruction techniques.

Using vascularised MCF grafts is found to be successful in the management of persistent scaphoid nonunion after failed previous fixation in presence of AVN with good union rates and clinical improvement. Our study results showed that the restoration of scaphoid bone vasculature and proper alignment of carpal bones using vascularized medial femoral condyle grafts may lead to successful treatment of nonunions after failed previous fixation attempts. This technique may be also useful in patients with scaphoid AVN or carpal collapse. Our study union rate is a bit lower than other studies which shows that a lot of factors could contribute to the union rate such as smoking, age and method of fixation and should be standardized in all studies to get comparable results (Table 2). Long-term follow-up is recommended with a larger study group and careful recording of the morbidity of the donor site for evaluation of the efficacy of this management technique.

Conclusion

We concluded that the free MFC vascularized bone grafts represent a great choice in the treatment of scaphoid nonunions after previously failed fixation showing improvement in the overall functional outcome with the correction of scaphoid humpback deformity. Patients can expect considerable pain relief and improvement in grip strength without great morbidity. We believe that this is a welcomed addition to the repertoire of treatment modalities addressing scaphoid nonunion.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to report.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required.

Consent to participate

The authors have obtained written consent from the patient presented in this work.

Consent for publication

The authors have obtained written consent for the publication of the data presented in this work.

Authors’ contributions

Islam Koriem had the idea of the study, shared in research execution, conducted surgeries, and contributed to data interpretation Ahmed K El Ghazawy was involved in protocol development, patients recruitment, assisted in surgeries, collected data and shared in its analysis. Aly Abdalla Agina, researched literature and assisted in surgeries, shared in protocol development and contributed greatly to the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank members of orthopedic department, Ain Shams University for their continuous support and advice.

References

  1. Jones D Jr, Shin AY (2010) Medial femoral condyle vascularized bone grafts for scaphoid nonunions. Chirurgie de la main 29, 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Elgammal A, Lukas B. 2015. Vascularized medial femoral condyle graft for management of scaphoid non-union. J Hand Surg [Eur] 40(8), 848–854. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Henry M (2007) Collapsed scaphoid non-union with dorsal intercalated segment instability and avascular necrosis treated by vascularised wedge-shaped bone graft and fixation. J Hand Surg [Eur] 32, 148–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nagura N, Naito K, Sugiyama Y, Obata H, Goto K, Kaneko A, Tomita Y, Iwase Y, Kaneko K, Ishijima M (2021) Correction of humpback and DISI deformities by vascularized bone grafting in patients with scaphoid nonunion. SICOT-J 7, 13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yamamoto H, Jones DB, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2010) The arterial anatomy of the medial femoral condyle and its clinical implications. J Hand Surg Eur 35(7), 569–574. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones DB, Burger H, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2008) Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunions with an avascular proximal pole and carpal collapse. A comparison of two vascularized bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(12), 2616–2625. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Larson AN, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2007) Free medial femoral condyle bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions with humpback deformity and proximal pole avascular necrosis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 11(4), 246–258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michel Roberto B, Samuel R, Bruno L (2015) Scaphoid fracture nonunion: correlation of radiographic imaging, proximal fragment histologic viability evaluation, and estimation of viability at surgery. Int Orthop (SICOT) 39, 67–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matić S, Vučković C, Lešić A, et al. (2021) Pedicled vascularized bone grafts compared with xenografts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Int Orthop (SICOT) 45, 1017–1023. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mack GR, Bosse MJ, Gelberman RH, Yu E (1984) The natural history of scaphoid nonunion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66, 504–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Finsen V, Hofstad M, Haugan H (2006) Most scaphoid non-unions heal with bone chip grafting and Kirschner-wire fixation. Thirty-nine patients reviewed 10 years after operation. Injury 37, 854–859. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang MA, Bishop AT, Moran SL, Shin AY (2006) The outcomes and complications of 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone grafting of scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 31(3), 387–396. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doi K, Oda T, Soo-Heong T, Nanda V. 2000. Free vascularized bone graft for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am 25(3), 507–519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Arora R, Lutz M, Zimmermann R, Krappinger D, Niederwanger C, Gabl M (2010) Free vascularised iliac bone graft for recalcitrant avascular nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92(2), 224–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tambe AD, Cutler L, Stilwell J, Murali SR, Trail IA, Stanley JK (2005) Scaphoid nonunion: the role of vascularized grafting in recalcitrant non-unions of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br (2006), 31(2), 185–190. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Cheveigne C, Croutzet P, Ferreira B, Gaston-Nouvel A (2016) Failed bone grafts in scaphoid non-unions: is it wise to start all over? J Hand Surg Am 41(9), S36–S37. [Google Scholar]
  17. Green DP (1985) The effect of avascular necrosis on Russe bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 10(5), 597–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith BS, Cooney WP (1996) Revision of failed bone grafting for nonunion of the scaphoid.Treatment options and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327, 98–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moon ES, Dy CJ, Derman P, Vance MC, Carlson MG (2013) Management of nonunion following surgical management of scaphoid fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9), 548–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gabl M, Reinhart C, Lutz M, Bodner G, Rudisch A, Hussl H, Pechlaner S (1999) Vascularized bone graft from the iliac crest for the treatment of nonunion of the proximal part of the scaphoid with an avascular fragment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(10), 1414–1428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sakai K, Doi K, Kawai S (1991) Free vascularized thin corticoperiosteal graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 87, 290–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones DB Jr, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2010) Free-vascularized medial femoral condyle bone transfer in the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(4), 1176–1184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Koriem I, Agina AA & El Ghazawy AK (2023) Treatment of failed scaphoid nonunion fixation using free medial femoral condyle vascularized bone grafting. SICOT-J 9, 7

All Tables

Table 1

Preoperative and postoperative characteristics of patients in whom scaphoid nonunion failed to unite after mfc bone-grafting.

In the text
Table 2

Outcomes of revision surgery for scaphoid nonunion with proximal pole osteonecrosis nonunion treated with MFC-free vascularized graft vascularized bone graft.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

a) Preoperative PA wrist X-ray of non-united scaphoid fracture after fixation with Herbert screw. b) Postoperative X-ray after revision fixation using vascularized MFC graft and refixation. c) Follow-up X-ray showing full scaphoid union.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

a) Postoperative PA wrist X-ray of revision fixation of non-united scaphoid using k wires and vascularized MFC graft. b) Follow-up X-ray. c) X-ray after wires removal showing full scaphoid union.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

a) Preoperative PA wrist X-ray of no-nunited scaphoid fixed with Herbert screw. b) Follow-up X-ray showing full union after revision fixation using MFC graft.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 4

Intraoperative images, a) non-united scaphoid fracture site; b) harvesting vascularised MFC graft; c) graft with vascular pedicle; d) graft after vascular anastomosis.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.