Table 1
Biomechanical comparison of Femoral fixation methods.
| Femoral fixation | Premature rupture during cycling | Ultimate load (N) (Mean ± SD) | Elongation (mm) (Mean ± SD) | Stiffness (N/mm) (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group F1: Biosure© RG 5 mm 5 mm | 5/5 (100%) | |||
| Group F2: Biosure© RG 7 mm | 2/5 (40%) | 255 ± 170 | 6.7 ± 4.5 | 90 ± 5 |
| Group F3: Healicoil Regenesorb 4.75 mm Anchor © | 3/5 (60%) | 308 ± 44 | 7.4 ± 1.4 | 119 ± 20 |
| Group F4: Ultrabutton© | 2/5 (40%) | 427 ± 215 | 10.7 ± 3.8 | 111 ± 21 |
| P-value | 0.506 | 0.389 | 0.208 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.