Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024004
Published online 08 February 2024
  1. Otsuki S, Okamoto Y, Murakami T, et al. (2018) Patellofemoral reconstruction for patellar instability with patella alta in middle-aged patients: Clinical outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104, 217–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chouteau J (2016) Surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surg Res 102, S189–S194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt EA (2009) MPFL reconstruction for PF instability. The soft (tissue) approach. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surg Res 95, 97–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deie M, Ochi M, Sumen Y, et al. (2005) A long-term follow-up study after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using the transferred semitendinosus tendon for patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 522–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hapa O, Aksahin E, Ozden R, et al. (2012) Aperture fixation instead of transverse tunnels at the patella for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 322–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinterwimmer S, Imhoff AB, Minzlaff P, et al. (2013) Anatomical two-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with hardware-free patellar graft fixation: technical note and preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2147–2154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNeilan RJ, Everhart JS, Mescher PK, et al. (2018) Graft choice in isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of rates of recurrent instability and patient-reported outcomes for autograft, allograft, and synthetic options. Arthroscopy 34, 1340–1354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Panni AS, Alam M, Cerciello S, et al. (2011) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a divergent patellar transverse 2-tunnel technique. Am J Sports Med 39, 2647–2655. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neri T, Philippot R, Carnesecchi O, et al. (2015) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: clinical and radiographic results in a series of 90 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101, 65–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raoulis VA, Zibis A, Chiotelli MD, et al. (2021) Biomechanical evaluation of three patellar fixation techniques for MPFL reconstruction: Load to failure did not differ but interference screw stabilization was stiffer than suture anchor and suture-knot fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(11), 3697–3705. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Russo F, Doan J, Chase DC, et al. (2016) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: fixation technique biomechanics. J Knee Surg 29, 303–309. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schottle P, Schmeling A, Romero J, Weiler A (2009) Anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a free gracilis autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 305–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Servien E, Fritsch B, Lustig S, et al. (2011) In vivo positioning analysis of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39, 134–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shatrov J, Colas A, Fournier G, et al. (2022) Tibial tuberosity osteotomy and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patella dislocation following total knee arthroplasty: A double fixation technique. SICOT-J 8, 23. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bremond N, Prima R, Rabattu P-Y, et al. (2022) Isolated MPFL reconstruction with soft tissue femoral fixation technique in 54 skeletally immature patients: Clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up. A French multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 109(8), 103530. [Google Scholar]
  16. He W, Yang YM, Liu M, et al. (2013) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using hamstring tendon graft with different methods: a biomechanical study. Chin Med Sci J 28, 201–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lenschow S, Schliemann B, Gestring J, et al. (2013) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: fixation strength of 5 different techniques for graft fixation at the patella. Arthroscopy 29, 766–773. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russ SD, Tompkins M, Nuckley D, Macalena J (2015) Biomechanical comparison of patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43, 195–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao X, Zhang H (2021) Biomechanical comparison of 2 patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: transosseous sutures vs suture anchors. Orthop J Sports Med 9(10), 23259671211041404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gould HP, Delaney NR, Parks BG, et al. (2021) Interference screw versus suture anchors for femoral fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Orthop J Sports Med 9(3), 2325967121989282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnston TR, Liles J, Riboh J (2020) Anchor-based femoral fixation for physeal-sparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a time-zero biomechanical comparison with tenodesis screw fixation. Am J Sports Med 48, 3021–3027. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Joyner PW, Bruce J, Roth TS, et al. (2017) Biomechanical tensile strength analysis for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee 24, 965–976. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mountney J, Senavongse W, Amis AA, Thomas NP (2005) Tensile strength of the medial patellofemoral ligament before and after repair or reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87, 36–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zampieri A, Girardin C, Hocquet B, et al. (2022) Patellar dislocation recurrence after pediatric MPFL reconstruction: Bone tunnels and soft tissues versus suture anchors and interference screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 109(8), 103515. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsushima T, Tsukada H, Sasaki S, et al. (2019) Biomechanical analysis of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: FiberTape® with knotless anchors versus a semitendinosus tendon autograft with soft anchors. J Orthop Sci 24, 663–667. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, et al. (2003) Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10, 215–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ridley TJ, Macalena JA, Arendt EA (2018) Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon allograft. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 8, e5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luxenburg D, Rizzo MG (2023) Anatomy, bony pelvis and lower limb: medial patellofemoral ligament. Treasure Island (FL), StatPearls Publishing, [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsushima T, Tsukada H, Sasaki S, et al. (2019) Biomechanical analysis of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: FiberTape(R) with knotless anchors versus a semitendinosus tendon autograft with soft anchors. J Orthop Sci 24, 663–667. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Micucci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, et al. (2010) The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26, 1105–1110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Namkoong S, Heywood CS, Bravman JT, et al. (2006) The effect of interference screw diameter on soft tissue graft fixation. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63, 153–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ (2006) Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med 34, 1478–1485. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bollier M, Fulkerson J, Cosgarea A, Tanaka M (2011) Technical failure of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27, 1153–1159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.