Table 1
Studies documenting the presence and implications of autofusion.
Study | Year | Authors | Design | Number of patients | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods [10]. | 2010 | Cahill et al. | Retrospective, single centre | 9 |
|
Avoidance of “final” surgical fusion after growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis [15]. | 2016 | Jain et al. | Retrospective, multicentre | 167,137 underwent definitive fusion (final fusion group), 30 did not (observation group) |
|
Final fusion after growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis is it really final? [16]. | 2016 | Poe-Kochert et al. | Retrospective, multicentre | 100 |
|
Graduation protocol after growing-rod treatment: removal of implants without new instrumentation is not a realistic approach [14]. | 2017 | Kocyigit et al. | Prospective, single centre | 26 |
|
Group 1 removed the rods without definitive fusion | |||||
Group 2 removed the rods and underwent definitive fusion | |||||
Does the law of diminishing returns apply to the lengthening of the MCGR rod in early-onset scoliosis with reference to growth velocity? [17]. | 2017 | Gardner et al. | Retrospective review of prospectively collected data, single-centre | 28 |
|
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.