Open Access
Table 3
Comparison of dual-mobility cups loosening, dislocation rates and survivorship in the literature.
| Authors | n | Mean follow-up | Cup coating | Cup aseptic loosening | Dislocation rates | Cup survivorship |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philippot et al. [6] | 438 | 17 | Alumina-HAP | 3% | 5% | 96% |
| Combes et al. [15] | 2179 | 7 | HAP, alumina-HAP, titanium-HAP | 1.7% | 0.6% | 93% |
| Laurendon et al. [16] | 100 | 10 | Titanium HAP | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Chouteau et al. [17] | 168 | 8.4 | Titanium HAP | 0% | 0% | / |
| Gaillard et al. [22] | 163 | 11 | Titanium HAP | 0.32% | 0% | 98% |
| Present study | 128 | 14.2 | Titanium-HAP | 0.78% | 0.78% | 99.2% |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.