Open Access
Table 1
Demographic of patients and clinical outcome.a
No | Age/Sex | BMI Kg/m2 | Cause of deformity | Site | Deformity (°) | Alignment | Preop ROM (°) | Postop ROM (°) | Preop KSS | Preop function score | Postop KSS | Postop function score | F/U (years) | Comp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coronal femur | Sagittal femur | Coronal tibia | Sagittal tibia | ||||||||||||||
1 | 70/M | 30 | Malunion | Femur | 18 | 14.7 | Varus Procurvatum | 10–80 | 0–100 | 38 | 0 | 93 | 80 | 1.8 | No | ||
2 | 77/M | 24 | Malunion with plate in-situ | Femur | 15 | 6.9 | Valgus Procurvatum | 20–100 | 5–100 | 25 | 30 | 87 | 85 | 2.2 | No | ||
3 | 70/M | 30 | Malunion | Femur | 23 | 14.5 | Varus Recurvatum | 5–40 | 0–85 | 17 | 30 | 87 | 85 | 2 | No | ||
4 | 66/M | 25.5 | Malunion | Femur | 15 | 18.6 | Varus Procurvatum | 10–75 | 0–100 | 25 | 30 | 95 | 80 | 1.5 | Knee Hematoma | ||
5 | 59/M | 30 | Malunion | Femur | 19.1 | 9.1 | Varus Procurvatum | 10–90 | 5–100 | 39 | 45 | 75 | 70 | 1 | No | ||
6 | 71/F | 25 | Malunion | Tibia | 8.3 | 5.7 | Valgus Recurvatum | 10–120 | 0–120 | 30 | 0 | 89 | 55 | 1 | No | ||
7 | 73/M | 34 | Malunion | Tibia | 10 | 8 | Varus Procurvatum | 10–110 | 0–110 | 35 | 30 | 86 | 90 | 1.2 | No | ||
8 | 72/M | 23 | Malunion | Tibia | 12.4 | 5.4 | Varus Procurvatum | 10–110 | 0–110 | 38 | 45 | 86 | 90 | 1.3 | No |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.