EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2016) SICOT-J, 2 (2016) 37 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 2, 2016
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 8
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016024
Published online 01 November 2016
  1. Garret WEJr, Swiontkowski MF, Weinstein JN, Callaghan J, Rosier RN, Berry DJ, Harrast J, Derosa GP (2006) American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Practice of Orthopaedic Surgeon: Part-II, certification examination case mix. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, 660–667. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pedowitz RA, Esch J, Snyder S (2002) Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development. Arthroscopy 18, E29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mabrey JD, Gillogly SD, Kasser JR, Sweeney HJ, Zarins B, Mevis H, Garrett WE, Poss R, Cannon WD (2002) Virtual reality simulation of arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy 18, E28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mabrey JD, Reinig KD, Cannon WD (2010) Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2586–2591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Howells NR, Gill HS, Carr AJ, Price AJ, Rees JL (2008) Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90, 494–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farnworth LR, Lemay DE, Wooldridge T et al. (2001) A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room. The Iowa Orthop J 21, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cannon WD, Eckhoff DG, Garrett WE, Hunter RE, Sweeny HJ (2006) Report of a group developing a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Clin Ortho Relat Res 442, 21–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stirling ER, Lewis TL, Ferran NA (2014) Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training. J Orthop Surg Res 9(1), 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Michelson JD (2006) Simulation in orthopaedic education: an overview of theory and practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, 1405–1411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Philbert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT (2002) ACGME work group on resident duty hours: new requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA 288(9), 1112–1114. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grechenig W, Fellinger M, Fankhauser F, Weiglein AH (1999) The Graz learning and training model for arthroscopic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 21(5), 347–350. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomoll AH, O’Toole RV, Czarnecki J, Warner JJ (2007) Surgical experience correlates with performance on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35, 883–888. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gomoll AH, Pappas G, Forsythe B, Warner JJ (2008) Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 36, 1139–1142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heng PA, Cheng CY, Wong TT, Wu W, Xu Y, Xie Y, Chui YP, Chan KM, Leung KS (2006) Virtual reality techniques: application to anatomic visualization and orthopaedic training. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442, 5–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCarthy A, Harley P, Smallwood R (1999) Virtual arthroscopy training: do the “virtual skills” developed match the real skills required? Stud Health Technol Inform 62, 221–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCarthy AD, Moody L, Waterworth AR, Bickerstaff DR (2006) Passive haptics in a knee arthroscopy simulator: is it valid for core skills training? Clin Orthop Relat Res 442, 13–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Srivastava S, Youngblood PL, Rawn C, Hariri S, Heinrichs WL, Ladd AL (2004) Initial evaluation of a shoulder arthroscopy simulator: establishing construct validity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13, 196–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morris AH, Jennings JE, Stone RG, Katz JA, Garroway RY, Hendler RC (1999) Guidelines for privileges in arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 9, 125–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Insel A, Carofino B, Leger R, Arciero R, Mazzocca AD (2009) The development of an objective model to assess arthroscopic performance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9), 2287–2295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Voto SJ, Clark RN, Zuelzer WA (1988) Arthroscopic training using pig knee joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226, 134–137. [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin KD, Belmont PJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Todd M, Cameron KL, Owens BD (2011) Arthroscopic basic task performance in shoulder simulator model correlates with similar task performance in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(21), e1271–e1275. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodgins JL, Veillette C (2013) Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency. BMC Med Educ 13, 61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173, 226–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK et al. (1999) Assessment of technical skills transfer from bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177, 167–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elliot MJ, Caprise PA, Henning AE, Kurtz CA, Sekiya JK (2012) Diagnostic knee arthroscopy: a pilot study to evaluate surgical skills. Arthroscopy 28(2), 218–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Slade Shantz JA, Leiter JR, Collins JB, MacDonald PB (2013) Validation of a global assessment of arthroscopic skills in a cadaveric knee model. Arthroscopy 29(1), 106–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shantz JAS, Leiter JR, Gottschalk T, MacDonald PB (2014) The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscop 22(1), 33–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Karahan M, Unalan PC, Bozkurt S et al. (2009) Correlation of basic motor skills with arthroscopic experience. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43, 49–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rose K, Pedowitz R (2015) Fundamental arthroscopic skill differentiation with virtual reality simulation. Arthroscopy 31(2), 299–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Braman JP, Sweet RM, Hannel DM, Ludewig PM, Van Heest AE (2015) Development and validation of a basic arthroscopic skills simulator. Arthrosocopy 31(1), 104–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Natividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL (2013) Current and future use of surgical skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident education: a national survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(1), e4(1–8). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gravante G, Venditti D (2013) A systematic review on low-cost box models to achieve basic and advanced laproscopic skills during modern surgical training. Surg Laprosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23, 109–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fucentese SF, Rahm S, Wieser K, Spillmann J, Harders M, Koch PP (2014) Evaluation of a virtual-reality-based simulator using passive haptic feedback for knee arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscop 23(4), 1077–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boutefnouchet T, Laios T (2016) Transfer of arthroscopic skills from computer simulation training to operating theatre: a review from two randomized controlled studies. SICOT-J 2, 4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Alvand A, Auplish S, Gill H, Rees JL (2008) Innate arthroscopic skills in medical students and variation in learning curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93, e115–e119. [Google Scholar]
  36. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18, 485–494. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.