Open Access
Volume 3, 2017
Article Number 40
Number of page(s) 6
Section Hip
Published online 02 June 2017
  1. Rowland LP (2000) Syndromes caused by weak muscles, in: Merritt’s neurology, 10th edn, Rowland LP, Editor. Philadelphia, USA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J (2007) Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. Arthroplasty J 22(6), 850–858. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huten D, Langlais F (2012) Luxations et subluxations des prothèses totales de hanche [Dislocation and subluxation after total hip replacement], in 13 mises au point en chirurgie de la hanche. Huten D, Editor. Paris, Elsevier Masson, 118–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kershaw CJ, Atkins RM, Dodd CA, Bulstrode CJ (1991) Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. A review of 276 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73, 564–568. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Massin P, Tanaka C, Huten D, Duparc J (1998) Treatment of aseptic acetabular loosening by reconstruction combining bone graft and Muller ring. Actuarial analysis over 11 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 84, 51–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A, 9–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6), 1125–1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) Theuse of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocationafter primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a meanfollow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33, 927–932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37, 2345–2350. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12), 3891–3900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Epinette JA, Béracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani G, Vandenbussche E (2013) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29(6), 1323–1328. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94, 731–739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Euvrard P, Leteurtre C, Girardin P (2008) Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  14. Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Derhi G, Bonnan J, Fessy MH, Lecuire F (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94, e23–e27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 466, 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  16. Merle D’Aubigné R, Postel M (1954) The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A, 451–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51, 737–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA (1989) Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplasty 4, 245–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Delee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. 1979. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Rela Res 141, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35, 225–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ, Della Valle CJ, Gross AE (2012) The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 351–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Haidukewych GJ, Boberg CJ (2006) Hospital cost of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, 290–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmalzried TP, Dorey FJ, McKellop H (1998) The multifactorial nature of polyethylene wear in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80, 1234–1242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 965–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36, 511–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Berton C, Girard J, Krantz N, Migaud H (2010) The Durom large diameter head acetabular component: early results with a large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92, 202–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bin Nasser A, Beaule PE, O’Neill M, Kim PR, Fazekas A (2010) Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 392–399. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lefevre C, Wessely L, Dubrana F, Gerard R (2007) The cemented retentive cup: preliminary results at three years. Interact Surgery 2, 165–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shrader MW, Parvizi J, Lewallen DG (2003) The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11), 2179–2183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Anderson MJ, Murray WR, Skinner HB (1994) Constrained acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 9(1), 17–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Goetz DD, Capello WN, Callaghan JJ (1998) Salvage of total hip instability with constrained acetabular component. Clin Orthop 355, 171–181. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernigou P, Filippini P, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Batista SU, Poignard A (2010) Constrained liner in neurologic or cognitively impaired patients undergoing primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 3255–3262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Noble P, Durrani S, Usrey M, Mathis K, Bardakos N (2012) Constrained cups appear incapable of meeting demands of revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 1907–1916. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.