Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 4, 2018
Article Number 33
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018031
Published online 30 July 2018
  1. Amendola RL, Goetz DD, Liu SS, Callaghan JJ (2017) Two- to 4-Year Followup of a short stem THA construct: excellent fixation, thigh pain a concern. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475, 375–383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baert IAC, Lluch E, Van Glabbeek F, et al. (2017) Short stem total hip arthroplasty: potential explanations for persistent post-surgical thigh pain. Med Hypotheses 107, 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown TE, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal JT (2002) Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10, 385–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jo WL, Lee YK, Ha YC, et al. (2016) Frequency, developing time, intensity, duration, and functional score of thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31, 1279–1282. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vresilovic EJ, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH (1996) Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size. J Arthroplasty 11, 304–311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chun YS, Lee JS, Cho YJ, Rhyu KH (2015) Periprosthetic insufficiency fracture around radiographically loose cemented stem: a report of two cases. Hip Pelvis 27, 183–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Donnell TMP, Chung WK, Neil MJ (2011) Periprosthetic stress fractures at the sleeve/stem junction of the Sivash-Range of motion modular femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 26, 633–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curtin BM, Fehring TK (2011) Bisphosphonate fractures as a cause of painful total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 34, 939–944. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, et al. (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96, 1742–1752. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tönnis D, Heinecke A, Nienhaus R, Thiele J (1979) [ Predetermination of arthrosis, pain and limitation of movement in congenital hip dysplasia (author's transl)]. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete 14, 808–815. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51, 737–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Woolson ST, Harris WH (1985) A method of intraoperative limb length measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jauković L, Ajdinović B, Gardasević K, Dopuda M (2008) 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of stress fracture of the metatarsal bones mimicking oligoarthritis. Vojnosanit Pregl 65, 325–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Biedert R (1993) Which investigations are required in stress fracture of the great toe sesamoids ? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112, 94–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kendoff DO, Citak M, Egidy CC, et al. (2013) Eleven-year results of the anatomic coated cfp stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28, 1047–1051. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kang JS (2014) Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 943–950. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cinotti G, Della Rocca A, Sessa P, et al. (2013) Thigh pain, subsidence and survival using a short cementless femoral stem with pure metaphyseal fixation at minimum 9-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99, 30–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ender SA, Machner A, Pap G, et al. (2007) Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years. Acta Orthop 78, 616–621. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maier MW, Streit MR, Innmann MM, et al. (2015) Cortical hypertrophy with a short, curved uncemented hip stem does not have any clinical impact during early follow-up orthopedics and biomechanics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16, 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pipino F, Molfetta L, Grandizio M (2000) Preservation of the femoral neck in hip arthroplasty: results of a 13- to 17-year follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 1, 31–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Corin Designers (2011) MiniHipTM Bone Conserving Hip Replacement. Surgical technique. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilbert RE, Salehi-Bird S, Gallacher PD, Shaylor P (2009) The Mayo conservative hip: experience from a district general hospital. Hip Int 19, 211–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Morales de Cano JJ, Gordo C, Illobre JM (2014) Early clinical results of a new conservative hip stem. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 359–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pozowski A, Ścigała K, Kierzek A, et al. (2013) Analysis of the influence of a metha-type metaphysical stem on biomechanical parameters. Acta Bioeng Biomech 15, 13–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gill IR, Gill K, Jayasekera N, Miller J Medium term results of the collum femoris preserving hydroxyapatite coated total hip replacement. Hip Int 18, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kwek EBK, Goh SK, Koh JSB, et al. (2008) An emerging pattern of subtrochanteric stress fractures: a long-term complication of alendronate therapy ? Injury 39, 224–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Buttaro M (2016) CORR Insights(®): Ultrashort versus conventional anatomic cementless femoral stems in the same patients younger than 55 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474, 2018–2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Buttaro MA, Slullitel PA, Zanotti G, et al. (2017) Is a short stem suitable for patients with hip dysplasia? a report on technical problems encountered during femoral reconstruction. Hip Int. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000562 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.