Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 6, 2020
Special Issue: "HIP and KNEE Replacement" Guest Editors: C Batailler, S Lustig, J Caton
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020015
Published online 03 June 2020
  1. Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B, 166–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Judet J, Judet H (1985) Anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Presse Med 14, 1031–1033. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, et al. (2011) Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93, 1392–1398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, et al. (2014) Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1476 patients 1–3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 85, 463–469. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trevisan C, Compagnoni R, Klumpp R (2017) Comparison of clinical results and patient’s satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital. Musculoskelet Surg 101, 261–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tsukada S, Wakui M (2015) Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: Five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 9, 157–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lecoanet P, Vargas M, Pallaro J, et al. (2018) Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104, 1143–1148. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng TE, Wallis JA, Taylor NF, et al. (2017) A prospective randomized clinical trial in total hip arthroplasty-comparing early results between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach. J Arthroplasty 32, 883–890. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bon G, Kacem EB, Lepretre PM, et al. (2019) Does the direct anterior approach allow earlier recovery of walking following total hip arthroplasty? A randomized prospective trial using accelerometry. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105, 445–452. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J, et al. (2019) Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101-B, 646–651. [Google Scholar]
  11. Purcell RL, Parks NL, Cody JP, Hamilton WG (2018) Comparison of wound complications and deep infections with direct anterior and posterior approaches in obese hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 33, 220–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ, Lombardi AV (2016) Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31, 2295–2298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goulding K, Beaulé PE, Kim PR, Fazekas A (2010) Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2397–2404. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zawadsky MW, Paulus MC, Murray PJ, Johansen MA (2014) Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 29, 1256–1260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woolson ST, Pouliot MA, Huddleston JI (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: Short-term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty 24, 999–1005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Müller DA, Zingg PO, Dora C (2014) Anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement: Five-year survivorship and learning curve. Hip Int 24, 277–283. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kong X, Grau L, Ong A, et al. (2019) Adopting the direct anterior approach: Experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population. J Orthop Surg Res 14, 218. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Berndt K, Rahm S, Dora C, Zingg PO (2019) Total hip arthroplasty with accolade/trident through the direct minimally invasive anterior approach without traction table: Learning curve and results after a minimum of 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105, 931–936. [Google Scholar]
  19. de Steiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon M (2015) What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 3860–3866. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lustig S (2015) Anterior approach (without specific table) and dual mobility acetabular component. Maitrise Orthop 243, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fauvernier M, Roche L, Uhry Z, et al. (2019) Multi-dimensional penalized hazard model with continuous covariates: Applications for studying trends and social inequalities in cancer survival. J Roy Statist Soc C 68, 1233–1257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fauvernier M, Remontet L, Uhry Z, et al. (2019) survPen: An R package for hazard and excess hazard modelling with multidimensional penalized splines. J Open Sour Softw 4, 1434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hallert O, Li Y, Brismar H, Lindgren U (2012) The direct anterior approach: Initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 7, 17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Seng BE, Adams JB (2009) Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl. 6), 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  26. Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, et al. (2016) Greater trochanter chip fractures in the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 605–611. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hartford JM, Graw BP, Knowles SB, Frosch DL (2018) Isolated greater trochanteric fracture and the direct anterior approach using a fracture table. J Arthroplasty 33, S253–S258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tay K, Tang A, Fary C, et al. (2019) The effect of surgical approach on early complications of total hip arthoplasty. Arthroplasty 1, 5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P (2008) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 23, 266–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ala Eddine T, Remy F, Chantelot C, et al. (2001) Anterior iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: Diagnosis and conservative treatment in 9 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87, 815–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee G-C, Marconi D (2015) Complications following direct anterior hip procedures: Costs to both patients and surgeons. J Arthroplasty 30, 98–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bingham JS, Spangehl MJ, Hines JT, et al. (2018) Does intraoperative fluoroscopy improve limb-length discrepancy and acetabular component positioning during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 33, 2927–2931. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Batailler C, Fary C, Batailler P, et al. (2017) Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: Safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation. Int Orthop 41, 499–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller LE, Gondusky JS, Kamath AF, et al. (2018) Influence of surgical approach on complication risk in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 89, 289–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Batailler C, Fary C, Servien E, Lustig S (2018) Influence of femoral broach shape on stem alignment using anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: A radiologic comparative study of 3 different stems. PLoS One 13, e0204591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.