EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2020) SICOT-J, 6 (2020) 17 References
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 6, 2020
Special Issue: "HIP and KNEE Replacement" Guest Editors: C Batailler, S Lustig, J Caton
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020018
Published online 17 June 2020
  1. Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22, 219–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Noyer D, Caton JH (2017) Once upon a time. Dual mobility: history. Int Orthop 41, 611–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD (1969) The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng 7, 31–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, et al. (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38, 1125–1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neri T, Philippot R, Klasan A, et al. (2018) Dual mobility acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty: advantages and drawbacks. Expert Rev Med Devices 15, 835–845. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Batailler C, Fary C, Verdier R, et al. (2017) The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review. Int Orthop 41, 645–659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jonker RC, van Beers LWAH, van der Wal BCH, et al. (2020) Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation without increasing revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106, 509–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laurendon L, Philippot R, Neri T, et al. (2018) Ten-year clinical and radiological outcomes of 100 total hip arthroplasty cases with a modern cementless dual mobility cup. Surg Technol Int 32, 331–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Philippot R, Neri T, Boyer B, et al. (2017) Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips. Int Orthop 41, 589–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neri T, Philippot R, Farizon F, Boyer B (2017) Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips. Int Orthop 41, 557–561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36, 511–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, et al. (2013) Evora® chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99, 923–928. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prudhon J-L, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37, 2345–2350. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39, 2097–2101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferreira A, Prudhon J-L, Verdier R, et al. (2017) Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results. Int Orthop 41, 439–445. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, et al. (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35, 225–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Epinette J-A (2015) Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 30, 241–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, et al. (2007) Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 22, 849–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prudhon JL (2011) Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int 21, 713–717. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D (2011) Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97, 2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, et al. (2017) Long-term wear of dual mobility total hip replacement cups: explant study. Int Orthop 42, 41–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM, et al. (1997) Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dangin A, Boulat S, Farizon F, Philippot R (2016) Prevention of dislocation risk during hip revision surgery with the dual mobility concept; study of a new generation of dual mobility cups. Surg Technol Int 29, 314–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Philippot R, Baulot E, Vermorel P-H, et al. (2019) Outcomes of Augmented Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups. Surg Technol Int 35, 274–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, et al. (2014) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 29, 432–437. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97, 807–813. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sayac G, Neri T, Schneider L, et al. (2020) Low revision rates at more than 10 years for dual-mobility cups cemented into cages in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35, 513–519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Neri T, Boyer B, Geringer J, et al. (2018) Intraprosthetic dislocation of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: still occurring? Int Orthop 43, 1097–1105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malatray M, Roux J-P, Gunst S, et al. (2017) Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation. Int Orthop 41, 507–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Di Laura A, Hothi HS, Henckel J, et al. (2017) Retrieval evidence of impingement at the third articulation in contemporary dual mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 41, 2495–2501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tsukada S, Wakui M (2015) Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 9, 157–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P (2008) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 23, 266–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW (2015) Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 623–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Batailler C, Fary C, Batailler P, et al. (2017) Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation. Int Orthop 41, 499–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Judet J, Judet H (1985) Anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Presse Med 14, 1031–1033. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Philippeau J-M, Durand J-M, Carret J-P, et al. (2010) Dual mobility design use in preventing total hip replacement dislocation following tumor resection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96, 2–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Klement MR, Hubbard EW, Wellman SS, Lachiewicz PF (2017) Acute intraprosthetic dissociation of a dual-mobility hip in the united states. Am J Orthop 46, E154–E159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Odland AN, Sierra RJ (2014) Intraprosthetic dislocation of a contemporary dual-mobility design used during conversion THA. Orthopedics 37, e1124–1128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Waddell BS, De Martino I, Sculco T, Sculco P (2016) Total hip arthroplasty dislocations are more complex than they appear: a case report of intraprosthetic dislocation of an anatomic dual-mobility implant after closed reduction. Ochsner J 16, 185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tyagi V, Akinbo O (2017) Early intraprosthetic dislocation of a dual mobility acetabular construct after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Case Rep 7, 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  41. Loubignac F, Felts E, Allal R (2012) Early intraprosthetic dislocation of a total hip replacement with dual mobility socket: clinical presentation and update review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22 (Suppl 1): 85–87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. De Martino I, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Sculco PK, Sculco TP (2014) Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 5, 180–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cvetanovich GL, Fillingham YA, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM (2015) Intraprosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility bearings associated with closed reduction: a report of two cases. JBJS Case Connect 5, e26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Whiteside LA (2012) Surgical technique: transfer of the anterior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle for abductor deficiency of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 503–510. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsang S-TJ, Ting J, Simpson AHRW, Gaston P (2017) Outcomes following debridement, antibiotics and implant retention in the management of periprosthetic infections of the hip: a review of cohort studies. Bone Joint J 99-B, 1458–1466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Pritsch M, et al. (2009) Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91, 1432–1439. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Park J-S (2014) The 27 to 29-year outcomes of the PCA total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years old. J Arthroplasty 29, 2256–2261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yoon TR, Rowe S-M, Kim M-S, et al. (2008) Fifteen- to 20-year results of uncemented tapered fully porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems. Int Orthop 32, 317–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grant P, Nordsletten L (2004) Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A, 2636–2641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG (2003) Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A, 1079–1083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, et al. (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91, 1130–1135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wroblewski BM (1986) 15–21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (211) 30–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A, 171–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. (2004) Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A, 690–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vigdorchik JM, D’Apuzzo MR, Markel DC, et al. (2015) Lack of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty with a new dual mobility acetabular design. Hip Int 25, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, et al. (2016) Dual mobility cups: an effective prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasties for preventing dislocations. Hip Int 26, 57–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90, 249–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 965–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wegrzyn J, Malatray M, Pibarot V, et al. (2020) Is isolated mobile component exchange an option in the management of intraprosthetic dislocation of a dual mobility cup? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478, 279–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, et al. (2017) Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop 41, 481–490. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.