Open Access
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hip
Published online 20 May 2021
  1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417, 112–120. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grantham WJ, Philippon MJ (2019) Etiology and pathomechanics of femoroacetabular impingement. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(3), 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  3. Na Nakorn P, Tantigate D, Lertwanich P (2016) Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis and structural abnormalities of the hip in patients with contralateral hip fractures. J Med Assoc Thail 99(10), 1119–1125. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nardo L, Parimi N, Liu F, Lee S, Jungmann PM, Nevitt MC (2015) Femoroacetabular impingement: prevalent and often asymptomatic in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(8), 2578–2586. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang P, Fan H, Wang X, Xu S, Yang L, Chen G (2020) The association between anterior femoroacetabular impingement and femoral neck fractures: an observational study. Med (United States) 99(6), e19068. [Google Scholar]
  6. Faulknek KG, Mcclung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 9, 1065–1070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tokyay OA, Güven M, Encan ME, Okay E (2017) The influence of acetabular morphology on prediction of proximal femur fractures types in an elderly population. Hip Int 27(5), 489–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mascarenhas V V, Rego P, Dantas P, Morais F, Mcwilliams J, Collado D (2016). European Journal of Radiology Imaging prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients, athletes, and asymptomatic individuals : A systematic review; 85:73–95. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuhns BD, Weber AE, Levy DM, Wuerz TH (2015) The natural history of femoroacetabular impingement. Front Surg 2, 1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nepple JJ, Lehmann CL, Ross JR, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC (2013) Coxa profunda is not a useful radiographic parameter for diagnosing pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Jt Surg 95(5), 417–423. [Google Scholar]
  11. Clohisy JC, Baca G, Beaulé PE, Kim YJ, Larson CM, Millis MB (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a north american cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(6), 1348–1356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diesel CV, Ribeiro TA, Coussirat C, Scheidt RB, Macedo CAS, Galia CR (2015) Coxa profunda in the diagnosis of pincertype femoroacetabular impingement and its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects. Bone Joint J 97-B(4), 478–483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Slikker W, Bush-Joseph CA, Salata MJ (2015) Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(6), 1199–1204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldin M, Anderson CN, Fredericson M, Safran MR, Stevens KJ (2015) Femoral neck stress fractures and imaging features of femoroacetabular impingement. PM R 7(6), 584–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Serong S, Haversath M, Jäger M, Landgraeber S (2019) Prevalence of cam deformity and its influence on therapy success in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(4), 546–554. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fraitzl CR, Kappe T, Brugger A, Billich C, Reichel H (2013) Reduced head-neck offset in nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(8), 1055–1060. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Beck M, Leunig M, Clarke E, Ganz R (2004) Femoroacetabular impingement as a factor in the development of nonunion of the femoral neck: A report of three cases. J Orthop Trauma 18(7), 425–430. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steppacher SD, Albers CE, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M, Ganz R (2013) Femoroacetabular impingement predisposes to traumatic posterior hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(6), 1937–1943. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Strosberg DS, Ellis TJ, Renton DB (2016) The role of femoroacetabular impingement in core muscle injury/athletic pubalgia: diagnosis and management. Front Surg 3(February), 1–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shetty VD, Shetty NS, Shetty AP (2015) Groin pain in athletes: a novel diagnostic approach. Sicot-J 1, 16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopkinson-Woolley JA, Parker MJ (1998) Fractures of the hip: does the type of fall really affect the site of fracture? Injury 29(8), 585–587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Polesello GC, Queiroz MC, Ono NK, Honda EK, Guimarães RP, Ricioli Junior W (2009) Tratamento artroscópico do impacto femoroacetabular. Rev Bras Ortop 44(3), 230–238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Said HG, Masoud MA, Morsi MMA-H, El-Assal MA (2019) Outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the effect of morphological type and chondrolabral damage. Sicot-J 5, 16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mascarenhas VV, Ayeni OR, Egund N, Jurik AG, Caetano A, Castro M (2019) Imaging methodology for hip preservation: techniques, parameters, and thresholds. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 23(3), 197–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Barrientos C, Barahona M, Diaz J, Brañes J, Chaparro F, Hinzpeter J (2016) Is there a pathological alpha angle for hip impingement? A diagnostic test study. J Hip Preserv Surg 3(3), 223–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tannast M, Fritsch S, Zheng G, Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD (2015) Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(4), 1255–1266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.