Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 10
Section Ankle
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022012
Published online 15 April 2022
  1. Müller ME, Baumgart F, Buchanan J, Disegi JA, Texhammar R, Colton C, Perren SM (2013) AO/ASIF Instruments and Implants: A Technical: Manual. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mills LA, Aitken SA, Simpson A (2017) The risk of non-union per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthopaedica 88, 434–439. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Karladani AH, Granhed H, Karrholm J, Styf J (2001) The influence of fracture etiology and type on fracture healing: a review of 104 consecutive tibial shaft fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 121, 325–328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhandari M, Tornetta P, Sprague S, Najibi S, Petrisor B, Griffith L, Guyatt GH (2003) Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 17, 353–361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Sanders DW, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, McKee MD (2012) Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94, 1786–1793. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Reed AA, Joyner CJ, Isefuku S, Brownlow HC, Simpson AH (2003) Vascularity in a new model of atrophic nonunion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85, 604–610. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearson RG, Clement RG, Edwards KL, Scammell BE (2016) Do smokers have greater risk of delayed and non-union after fracture, osteotomy and arthrodesis? A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6, 010303. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT (2015) Diabetes and its effect on bone and fracture healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep 13, 327–335. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giannoudis P, Tzioupis C, Almalki T, Buckley R (2007) Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: Is it really different? A basic science perspective Injury 38(Suppl 1), 90–99. [Google Scholar]
  10. Epari DR, Schell H, Bail HJ, Duda GN (2006) Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep. Bone 38, 864–870. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lienau J, Schell H, Duda GN, Seebeck P, Muchow S, Bail HJ (2005) Initial vascularization and tissue differentiation are influenced by fixation stability. J Orthop Res 23, 639–645. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Perren SM, Cordey JC (1980) The concept of interfragmentary strain. In: Current Concepts of Internal Fixation of Fractures. Uhthoff HK, Editor. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahabreh Z, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK, Nikolaou VS, Giannoudis PV (2009) A cost analysis of treatment of tibial fracture nonunion by bone grafting or bone morphogenetic protein-7. Int Orthop 33, 1407–1414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dahabreh Z, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV (2007) Health economics: a cost analysis of treatment of persistent fracture non-unions using bone morphogenetic protein-7. Injury 38, 371–377. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Patil S, Montgomery R (2006) Management of complex tibial and femoral nonunion using the Ilizarov technique, and its cost implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88, 928–932. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2007) The health economics of the treatment of long-bone non-unions. Injury 38(Suppl 2), 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen YJ, Wang CJ, Yang KD, Chang PR, Huang HC, Huang YT, Wang FS (2003) Pertussis toxin-sensitive Galphai protein and ERK-dependent pathways mediate ultrasound promotion of osteogenic transcription in human osteoblasts. FEBS Lett 554, 154–158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li M, Thompson DD, Paralkar VM (2007) Prostaglandin E(2) receptors in bone formation. Int Orthop 31, 767–772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reher P, Harris M, Whiteman M, Hai HK, Meghji S (2002) Ultrasound stimulates nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 production by human osteoblasts. Bone 31, 236–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krausz A, Friedman AJ (2015) Nitric oxide as a surgical adjuvant. Future Sci OA 1, 56–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Mowafi H, Mohsen M (2005) The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus maturation in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop (SICOT) 29, 121–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salem KH, Schmelz A (2014) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop (SICOT) 38, 1477–1482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. NICE (2018) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to promote healing of delayed-union and non-union fractures. Intervention Procedures Guidance; IPG623. [Google Scholar]
  24. Walker NA, Denegar CR, Preische J (2007) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review. J Athl Train 42, 530–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Majeed H, Karim T, Davenport J, Karski M, Smith R, Clough TM (2019) Clinical and patient-reported outcomes following Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS, Exogen) for established post-traumatic and post-surgical nonunion in the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Surg Epub ahead of print 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. NICE (2013) EXOGEN ultrasound bone healing system for long bone fractures with non-union or delayed healing. Medical Technologies Guidance MTG12. [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrison A, Lin S, Pounder N, Mikuni-Takagaki Y (2016) Mode & mechanism of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in fracture repair. Ultrasonics 70, 45–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. TRUST Investigators writing group, Busse JW, Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, Heckman JD, Tornetta P, Leung K-S, Heels-Ansdell D, Makosso-Kallyth S, Della Rocca GJ, Jones CB, Guyatt GH (2016) Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial. BMJ 355, i5351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.