EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2022) SICOT-J, 8 (2022) 10 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ankle
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022007
Published online 01 April 2022
  1. Terrell RD, Montgomery SR, Pannell WC, Sandlin WC, Inoue H, Wang JC, SooHoo NF (2013) Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States. Foot Ankle Int 34, 1486–1492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Seow D, Kennedy JG (2016) Ankle arthrodesis: A systematic approach and review of the literature. World J Orthop, 7, 700–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Usuelli FG, Indino C, Maccario C, Manzi L, Salini V (2016) Total ankle replacement through a lateral approach: surgical tips. SICOT J 2, 38. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jo S-H, Kim Y-K, Choi Y-H (2018) Histological evaluation of the healing process of various bone graft materials after engraftment into the human body. Materials 11, 714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumhauer JF, Pinzur MS, Daniels TR, Lin SS, Beasley W, Donahue RMJ, DiGiovani CW (2013) Survey on the need for bone graft in foot and ankle fusion surgery. Foot Ankle Int 34, 1629–1633. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosenfeld PF, Budgen SA, Saxby TS (2004) Triple arthrodesis: Is bone grafting necessary? J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  7. Asomugha EU, Den Hartog BD, Junko JT, Alexander IJ (2016) Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion for severe deformity and bone loss. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24, 125–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chou LB, Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, McPeake WT, Mizel MS (2007) Stress fracture as a complication of autogenous bone graft harvest from the distal tibia. Foot Ankle Int 28, 199–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boone DW (2003) Complications of iliac crest graft and bone grafting alternatives in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 8, 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zoricic S, Maric J, Bobinac D, Vukicevic S (2003) Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins and cartilage-derived morphogenetic proteins during osteophyte formation in humans. J Anat 202, 26277. [Google Scholar]
  11. Akiyama T, Okazaki K, Mawatari T, Ikemura S, Nakamura S (2016) Autologous osteophyte grafting for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthrosc Tech 5, e989–e995. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dodds RA, Merry K, Littlewood A, Gowen M (1994) Expression of mRNA for IL1 beta, IL6 and TGF beta 1 in developing human bone and cartilage. J Histochem Cytochem 42, 733–744. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Horner A, Kemp P, Summers C (1998) Expression and distribution of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms and their signaling receptors in growing human bone. Bone 23, 95–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ishihara K, Okazaki K, Akiyama T, Akasaki Y, Nakashima Y (2017) Characterisation of osteophytes as an autologous bone graft source. Bone Joint Res 6, 73–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leow JM, Clement ND, Tawonsawatruk T, Simpson CJ, Simpson AHRW (2016) The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures. Bone Joint Res 5, 116–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sierevelt IN, Zwiers R, Schats W, Haverkamp D, Terwee CB, Nolte PA, Kerkhoffs GMMJ (2018) Measurement properties of the most commonly used foot- and ankle-specific questionnaires: The FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 2059–2073. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yuan S-M, Wang Y-Q, Shen Y, Jing H (2011) Transforming growth factor-β in graft vessels: histology and immunohistochemistry. Clinics 66, 895–901. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding W, Zhang W, Hui F, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Li X, Shi F (2012) Cell-specific expression and immunolocalization of nitric oxide synthase isoforms and soluble guanylyl cyclase α1 and β1 subunits in the ovary of fetal, neonatal and immature pigs. Anim Reprod Sci 131, 172–180. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fedchenko N, Reifenrath J (2014) Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue – a review. Diagn Pathol 29, 221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamedean A, Said HG, El-Sharkawi M, El-Adly W, Said GZ (2010) Technique and short-term results of ankle arthrodesis using anterior plating. Int Orthop 34, 833–837. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fasolis M, Boffano P, Ramieri G (2012) Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone graft. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114, 586–591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. DeOrio JK, Farber DC (2005) Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone grafting in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 26, 147–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Calori GM, Colombo M, Mazza EL, Mazzola S, Malagoli E, Mineo GV (2014) Incidence of donor site morbidity following harvesting from iliac crest or RIA graft. Injury 45, S116–S120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Alt V, Nawab A, Seligson D (1999) Bone grafting from the proximal tibia. J Trauma 47, 555–557. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Biddinger KR, Komenda GA, Schon LC, Myerson MS (1998) A new modified technique for harvest of calcaneal bone grafts in surgery on the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 19, 322–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes WR, Smith RW (1998) Trochanteric bone grafts in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 17, 402–405. [Google Scholar]
  27. Krause JO, Perry CR (1995) Distal femur as a donor site of autogenous cancellous bone graft. J Orthop Trauma 9, 145–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scranton PE (2002) Use of bone graft substitutes in lower extremity reconstructive surgery. Foot Ankle Int 23, 689–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sohn HS, Oh JK (2019) Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries. Biomater Res 14, 9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Resnick R, Niwayama G (1995) Degenerative disease in extraspinal locations. In: Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, 2nd edn. Resnick D, Editor. Philadelphia, WB Saunders. [Google Scholar]
  31. van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB (2007) Osteophytes: Relevance and biology. Osteoarthr Cartil 15, 237–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vaseenon T, Amendola A (2012) Update on anterior ankle impingement. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5, 145–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen G, Deng C, Li Y-P (2012) TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J Biol Sci 8, 271–288. [Google Scholar]
  34. Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC (2015) Fracture healing: Mechanism and intervention. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 45–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Patil AS, Sable RB, Kothari RM (2011) An update on transforming growth factor-B (TGF-B): Sources, types, functions and clinical applicability for cartilage/bone healing. J Cell Physiol 226, 3094–3103. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nagaosa Y, Lanyon P, Doherty M (2002) Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: A radiographic study. Ann Rheum Dis 61, 319–324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim J-G, Ha D-J, Gwak H-C, Kim C-W, Kim J-H, Lee S-J, Kim Y-J, Lee C-R, Park J-H (2018) Ankle arthrodesis: A comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach. Clin Orthop Surg 10, 368–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kamalapathy PN, Plessis MID, Chen D, Bell J, Park JS, Werner BC (2021) Obesity and postoperative complications following ankle arthrodesis: A propensity score matched analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 60, 1193–1197. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.